head to head · open source

Open WebUI vs mercury-agent

Open WebUI has 157,575 GitHub stars, 22,923 forks, 294 open issues and last shipped yesterday. mercury-agent has 3,768 stars, 388 forks, 60 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Open WebUI leads on adoption by 4,082% (157,575 vs 3,768 stars). Open WebUI is written in Python under a custom or non-standard licence; mercury-agent is written in TypeScript under MIT. Open WebUI has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, mercury-agent 10%. mercury-agent was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Open WebUI ★ 158K mercury-agent ★ 3.8K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Open WebUI mercury-agent
GitHub stars ★ 158K ★ 3.8K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 23K ⑂ 388
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Open WebUI if

  • You weight community size — 158K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Open WebUI profile →

pick mercury-agent if

  • You want the mercury-agent feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and mercury-agent fits your workflow better

full mercury-agent profile →

About Open WebUI

Open WebUI 👋 Open WebUI is a home for AI , a self hosted AI platform that's extensible , feature rich , user friendly, and built to run entirely offline . With support for Ollama and OpenAI compatible APIs , it gives you a powerful, provider agnostic interface for both local and cloud based models. Passionate about open source AI? Join our team → [!TIP] Looking for an Enterprise Plan? – Speak with Our Sales Team Today! For more information, be sure to check out our Open WebUI Documentation. Key Features of Open WebUI ⭐ 🚀 Effortless Setup : Install seamlessly via pip, uv, Docker, or Kubernetes (kubectl…

read the full Open WebUI overview →

About mercury-agent

Soul driven AI agent with permission hardened tools, token budgets, and multi channel access. Remembers what matters. Asks before it acts. Runs 24/7 from CLI, Telegram, or Web. 31 built in tools, Kanban boards, extensible skills, SQLite backed Second Brain memory. 🔖 Current Stable: v1.2.3 English 简体中文 Quick Start One liner install (no Node.js required) — downloads the latest standalone binary for your OS: Or via npm if you already have Node.js 20+: Or install the npm package globally: First run triggers the setup wizard (name, provider, optional Telegram). After setup, Mercury opens the Ink TUI startup screen…

read the full mercury-agent overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Related comparisons

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Open WebUI or mercury-agent more popular?

Open WebUI has 157,575 GitHub stars and mercury-agent has 3,768. Open WebUI has the larger community by that measure.

Are Open WebUI and mercury-agent free?

Both are open source. Open WebUI has no licence declared in this registry, and mercury-agent is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Open WebUI and mercury-agent?

Open WebUI is written in Python and mercury-agent in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Open WebUI or mercury-agent?

Choose Open WebUI if you want the larger community (157,575 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose mercury-agent if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.