head to head · open source

Open WebUI vs Langchain-Chatchat

Open WebUI has 157,575 GitHub stars, 22,923 forks, 294 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Langchain-Chatchat has 38,714 stars, 6,255 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped 12 months ago. Open WebUI leads on adoption by 307% (157,575 vs 38,714 stars). Open WebUI is written in Python under a custom or non-standard licence; Langchain-Chatchat is written in Python under Apache-2.0. Open WebUI has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, Langchain-Chatchat 16%. Open WebUI was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Open WebUI ★ 158K Langchain-Chatchat ★ 39K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Open WebUI Langchain-Chatchat
GitHub stars ★ 158K ★ 39K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-11-02 2025-11-10
Forks ⑂ 23K ⑂ 6.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Open WebUI if

  • You weight community size — 158K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Open WebUI profile →

pick Langchain-Chatchat if

  • You want the Langchain-Chatchat feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and Langchain-Chatchat fits your workflow better

full Langchain-Chatchat profile →

About Open WebUI

Open WebUI 👋 Open WebUI is a home for AI , a self hosted AI platform that's extensible , feature rich , user friendly, and built to run entirely offline . With support for Ollama and OpenAI compatible APIs , it gives you a powerful, provider agnostic interface for both local and cloud based models. Passionate about open source AI? Join our team → [!TIP] Looking for an Enterprise Plan? – Speak with Our Sales Team Today! For more information, be sure to check out our Open WebUI Documentation. Key Features of Open WebUI ⭐ 🚀 Effortless Setup : Install seamlessly via pip, uv, Docker, or Kubernetes (kubectl…

read the full Open WebUI overview →

About Langchain-Chatchat

🌍 READ THIS IN ENGLISH 📃 LangChain Chatchat (原 Langchain ChatGLM) 基于 ChatGLM 等大语言模型与 Langchain 等应用框架实现,开源、可离线部署的 RAG 与 Agent 应用项目。 目录 概述 功能介绍 0.3.x 功能一览 已支持的模型推理框架与模型 快速上手 pip 安装部署 源码安装部署/开发部署 Docker 部署 项目里程碑 联系我们 概述 🤖️ 一种利用 langchain 思想实现的基于本地知识库的问答应用,目标期望建立一套对中文场景与开源模型支持友好、可离线运行的知识库问答解决方案。 💡 受 GanymedeNil 的项目 document.ai 和 AlexZhangji 创建的 ChatGLM 6B Pull Request 启发,建立了全流程可使用开源模型实现的本地知识库问答应用。本项目的最新版本中可使用 Xinference、Ollama 等框架接入 GLM 4 Chat、 Qwen2 Instruct、 Llama3 等模型,依托于 langchain 框架支持通过基于 FastAPI 提供的 API 调用服务,或使用基于 Streamlit 的 WebUI 进行操作。 ✅ 本项目支持市面上主流的开源 LLM、 Embedding 模型与向量数据库,可实现全部使用 开源 模型 离线私有部署…

read the full Langchain-Chatchat overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Related comparisons

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Open WebUI or Langchain-Chatchat more popular?

Open WebUI has 157,575 GitHub stars and Langchain-Chatchat has 38,714. Open WebUI has the larger community by that measure.

Are Open WebUI and Langchain-Chatchat free?

Both are open source. Open WebUI has no licence declared in this registry, and Langchain-Chatchat is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Open WebUI and Langchain-Chatchat?

Open WebUI is written in Python and Langchain-Chatchat in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Open WebUI or Langchain-Chatchat?

Choose Open WebUI if you want the larger community (157,575 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Langchain-Chatchat if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.