head to head · open source
Open WebUI vs ctxport
Open WebUI has 157,575 GitHub stars, 22,923 forks, 294 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ctxport has 653 stars, 135 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. Open WebUI leads on adoption by 24,031% (157,575 vs 653 stars). Open WebUI is written in Python under a custom or non-standard licence; ctxport is written in TypeScript under MIT. Open WebUI has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, ctxport 21%. Open WebUI was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Open WebUI | ctxport | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 158K | ★ 653 |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-03-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 23K | ⑂ 135 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Open WebUI if
- You weight community size — 158K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ctxport if
- You want the ctxport feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and ctxport fits your workflow better
About Open WebUI
Open WebUI 👋 Open WebUI is a home for AI , a self hosted AI platform that's extensible , feature rich , user friendly, and built to run entirely offline . With support for Ollama and OpenAI compatible APIs , it gives you a powerful, provider agnostic interface for both local and cloud based models. Passionate about open source AI? Join our team → [!TIP] Looking for an Enterprise Plan? – Speak with Our Sales Team Today! For more information, be sure to check out our Open WebUI Documentation. Key Features of Open WebUI ⭐ 🚀 Effortless Setup : Install seamlessly via pip, uv, Docker, or Kubernetes (kubectl…
read the full Open WebUI overview →
About ctxport
CtxPort One click. Structured Markdown. Any AI conversation. Your AI conversations deserve a better clipboard. 简体中文 English Supported Platforms Get Started · Features · Documentation The Problem You just spent 45 minutes in a deep conversation with ChatGPT. You found the perfect architecture for your project. Now you need to share it with Claude for implementation. What do you do? Ctrl+A, Ctrl+C? You get a mess of HTML artifacts, broken formatting, and missing code blocks. Copy each message manually? Life is too short. Screenshot it? Text in images is where knowledge goes to die. AI conversations are the new…
read the full ctxport overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Open WebUI or ctxport more popular?
Open WebUI has 157,575 GitHub stars and ctxport has 653. Open WebUI has the larger community by that measure.
Are Open WebUI and ctxport free?
Both are open source. Open WebUI has no licence declared in this registry, and ctxport is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Open WebUI and ctxport?
Open WebUI is written in Python and ctxport in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Open WebUI or ctxport?
Choose Open WebUI if you want the larger community (157,575 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose ctxport if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.