head to head · open source

Open WebUI vs claude-chat-exporter

Open WebUI has 157,575 GitHub stars, 22,923 forks, 294 open issues and last shipped yesterday. claude-chat-exporter has 741 stars, 85 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. Open WebUI leads on adoption by 21,165% (157,575 vs 741 stars). Open WebUI is written in Python under a custom or non-standard licence; claude-chat-exporter is written in JavaScript under MIT. Open WebUI has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, claude-chat-exporter 11%. Open WebUI was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Open WebUI ★ 158K claude-chat-exporter ★ 741 category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Open WebUI claude-chat-exporter
GitHub stars ★ 158K ★ 741
License Custom / other MIT
Written in Python JavaScript
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-10-23
Forks ⑂ 23K ⑂ 85
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Open WebUI if

  • You weight community size — 158K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Open WebUI profile →

pick claude-chat-exporter if

  • You want the claude-chat-exporter feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and claude-chat-exporter fits your workflow better

full claude-chat-exporter profile →

About Open WebUI

Open WebUI 👋 Open WebUI is a home for AI , a self hosted AI platform that's extensible , feature rich , user friendly, and built to run entirely offline . With support for Ollama and OpenAI compatible APIs , it gives you a powerful, provider agnostic interface for both local and cloud based models. Passionate about open source AI? Join our team → [!TIP] Looking for an Enterprise Plan? – Speak with Our Sales Team Today! For more information, be sure to check out our Open WebUI Documentation. Key Features of Open WebUI ⭐ 🚀 Effortless Setup : Install seamlessly via pip, uv, Docker, or Kubernetes (kubectl…

read the full Open WebUI overview →

About claude-chat-exporter

Claude Chat Exporter A privacy first tool that exports your Claude.ai conversations to clean Markdown. It runs entirely in your browser — no server of its own, nothing uploaded, no tracking. Everything comes through — tables, math and code at full fidelity, plus artifacts, created files, charts and attachments — all read directly from Claude's own API. Exports carry YAML frontmatter with one heading per turn, so they drop straight into an Obsidian vault or a RAG pipeline. Claude's internal API changes without notice, and someone has to keep up. Sponsoring this project is what keeps it maintained. More → ⚡ One…

read the full claude-chat-exporter overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Related comparisons

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Open WebUI or claude-chat-exporter more popular?

Open WebUI has 157,575 GitHub stars and claude-chat-exporter has 741. Open WebUI has the larger community by that measure.

Are Open WebUI and claude-chat-exporter free?

Both are open source. Open WebUI has no licence declared in this registry, and claude-chat-exporter is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Open WebUI and claude-chat-exporter?

Open WebUI is written in Python and claude-chat-exporter in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Open WebUI or claude-chat-exporter?

Choose Open WebUI if you want the larger community (157,575 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose claude-chat-exporter if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.