head to head · open source
Open WebUI vs chatgpt_telegram_bot
Open WebUI has 157,575 GitHub stars, 22,923 forks, 294 open issues and last shipped yesterday. chatgpt_telegram_bot has 5,551 stars, 1,907 forks, 56 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. Open WebUI leads on adoption by 2,739% (157,575 vs 5,551 stars). Open WebUI is written in Python under a custom or non-standard licence; chatgpt_telegram_bot is written in Python under MIT. Open WebUI has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, chatgpt_telegram_bot 34%. Open WebUI was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (openai), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Open WebUI | chatgpt_telegram_bot | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 158K | ★ 5.6K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-06-14 |
| Forks | ⑂ 23K | ⑂ 1.9K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Open WebUI if
- You weight community size — 158K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick chatgpt_telegram_bot if
- You want the chatgpt_telegram_bot feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and chatgpt_telegram_bot fits your workflow better
About Open WebUI
Open WebUI 👋 Open WebUI is a home for AI , a self hosted AI platform that's extensible , feature rich , user friendly, and built to run entirely offline . With support for Ollama and OpenAI compatible APIs , it gives you a powerful, provider agnostic interface for both local and cloud based models. Passionate about open source AI? Join our team → [!TIP] Looking for an Enterprise Plan? – Speak with Our Sales Team Today! For more information, be sure to check out our Open WebUI Documentation. Key Features of Open WebUI ⭐ 🚀 Effortless Setup : Install seamlessly via pip, uv, Docker, or Kubernetes (kubectl…
read the full Open WebUI overview →
About chatgpt_telegram_bot
🤖 ChatGPT Telegram Bot ChatGPT, re created as a Telegram bot — and it works great. GPT 5.5 · Anthropic Claude (Opus / Sonnet / Haiku) · Vision · Voice · Image generation Fast replies, no daily limits, message streaming and 15 special chat modes. Web chatbots are great — but they're often laggy, rate limited, and locked behind a browser tab. This project puts the best models from OpenAI and Anthropic right inside Telegram , with your own API keys and no daily limits. 🚀 Try the live bot: @jadvebot · 🌐 Web: jadve.com — or deploy your own in two commands (Quick start ↓). ✨ Features ⚡ Low latency — replies usually…
read the full chatgpt_telegram_bot overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Open WebUI or chatgpt_telegram_bot more popular?
Open WebUI has 157,575 GitHub stars and chatgpt_telegram_bot has 5,551. Open WebUI has the larger community by that measure.
Are Open WebUI and chatgpt_telegram_bot free?
Both are open source. Open WebUI has no licence declared in this registry, and chatgpt_telegram_bot is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Open WebUI and chatgpt_telegram_bot?
Open WebUI is written in Python and chatgpt_telegram_bot in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Open WebUI or chatgpt_telegram_bot?
Choose Open WebUI if you want the larger community (157,575 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose chatgpt_telegram_bot if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.