head to head · open source
nanobot vs open-spaces
nanobot has 48,874 GitHub stars, 8,616 forks, 775 open issues and last shipped yesterday. open-spaces has 3,394 stars, 496 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. nanobot leads on adoption by 1,340% (48,874 vs 3,394 stars). nanobot is written in Python under MIT; open-spaces is written in JavaScript under MIT. nanobot has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, open-spaces 15%. open-spaces was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| nanobot | open-spaces | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 49K | ★ 3.4K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-08 | 2026-10-08 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.6K | ⑂ 496 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick nanobot if
- You weight community size — 49K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick open-spaces if
- You want the open-spaces feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and open-spaces fits your workflow better
About nanobot
nanobot is an ultra lightweight, open source, self hosted personal AI agent framework written in Python, aimed at individual developers and small teams who want to run their own agent through a browser WebUI, a terminal, or chat apps instead of renting a hosted assistant.
read the full nanobot overview →
About open-spaces
OpenSpaces is a free, MIT licensed, self hostable AI workspace that brings shared Spaces, editable pages, conversations, and AI tools into one application, aimed at individuals and teams who want an open alternative to ChatGPT Spaces running on their own infrastructure.
read the full open-spaces overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is nanobot or open-spaces more popular?
nanobot has 48,874 GitHub stars and open-spaces has 3,394. nanobot has the larger community by that measure.
Are nanobot and open-spaces free?
Both are open source. nanobot is licensed under MIT and open-spaces under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between nanobot and open-spaces?
nanobot is written in Python and open-spaces in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, nanobot or open-spaces?
Choose nanobot if you want the larger community (48,874 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose open-spaces if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.