head to head · open source

nanobot vs Onyx

nanobot has 48,302 GitHub stars, 8,534 forks, 775 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Onyx has 32,149 stars, 4,478 forks, 451 open issues and last shipped yesterday. nanobot leads on adoption by 50% (48,302 vs 32,149 stars). nanobot is written in Python under MIT; Onyx is written in Python under a custom or non-standard licence. nanobot has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, Onyx 14%. Onyx was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

nanobot ★ 48K Onyx ★ 32K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

nanobot Onyx
GitHub stars ★ 48K ★ 32K
License MIT Custom / other
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 8.5K ⑂ 4.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick nanobot if

  • You weight community size — 48K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full nanobot profile →

pick Onyx if

  • You want the Onyx feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and Onyx fits your workflow better

full Onyx profile →

About nanobot

nanobot is an ultra lightweight, open source, self hosted personal AI agent framework written in Python, aimed at individual developers and small teams who want to run their own agent through a browser WebUI, a terminal, or chat apps instead of renting a hosted assistant.

read the full nanobot overview →

About Onyx

Onyx is an open source AI application layer that gives teams a self hostable chat interface with retrieval augmented generation over their own company data and more than 50 indexing connectors.

read the full Onyx overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm hermes-agent vs opencode hermes-agent vs n8n openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all llama-cpp vs vllm openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

nanobot vs OpenClaw nanobot vs Hermes Agent nanobot vs Open WebUI nanobot vs odysseus nanobot vs LobeChat nanobot vs AnythingLLM nanobot vs Cherry Studio nanobot vs Jan nanobot vs LibreChat nanobot vs chatbox nanobot vs AstrBot nanobot vs openhuman

Frequently asked questions

Is nanobot or Onyx more popular?

nanobot has 48,302 GitHub stars and Onyx has 32,149. nanobot has the larger community by that measure.

Are nanobot and Onyx free?

Both are open source. nanobot is licensed under MIT, and Onyx has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between nanobot and Onyx?

nanobot is written in Python and Onyx in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, nanobot or Onyx?

Choose nanobot if you want the larger community (48,302 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Onyx if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.