head to head · open source

Cherry Studio vs Onyx

Cherry Studio has 51,943 GitHub stars, 4,977 forks, 1,514 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Onyx has 32,149 stars, 4,478 forks, 451 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Cherry Studio leads on adoption by 62% (51,943 vs 32,149 stars). Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Onyx is written in Python under a custom or non-standard licence. Cherry Studio has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Onyx 14%. Cherry Studio was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Cherry Studio ★ 52K Onyx ★ 32K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

Cherry Studio Onyx
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 32K
License AGPL-3.0 Custom / other
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 5.0K ⑂ 4.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Cherry Studio if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Cherry Studio profile →

pick Onyx if

  • You want the Onyx feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and Onyx fits your workflow better

full Onyx profile →

About Cherry Studio

Cherry Studio is a cross platform desktop application for interacting with large language models, built in TypeScript under the AGPL 3.0 license. It operates in the AI interaction and interfaces ecosystem, providing a unified interface to access cloud hosted models (OpenAI, Gemini, Anthropic), web services (Claude, Poe, Perplexity), and locally hosted models via Ollama or LM Studio.

read the full Cherry Studio overview →

About Onyx

Onyx is an open source AI application layer that gives teams a self hostable chat interface with retrieval augmented generation over their own company data and more than 50 indexing connectors.

read the full Onyx overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm hermes-agent vs opencode hermes-agent vs n8n openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all llama-cpp vs vllm openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

Cherry Studio vs OpenClaw Cherry Studio vs Hermes Agent Cherry Studio vs Open WebUI Cherry Studio vs odysseus Cherry Studio vs LobeChat Cherry Studio vs AnythingLLM Cherry Studio vs nanobot Cherry Studio vs Jan Cherry Studio vs LibreChat Cherry Studio vs chatbox Cherry Studio vs AstrBot Cherry Studio vs openhuman

Frequently asked questions

Is Cherry Studio or Onyx more popular?

Cherry Studio has 51,943 GitHub stars and Onyx has 32,149. Cherry Studio has the larger community by that measure.

Are Cherry Studio and Onyx free?

Both are open source. Cherry Studio is licensed under AGPL-3.0, and Onyx has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Cherry Studio and Onyx?

Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript and Onyx in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Cherry Studio or Onyx?

Choose Cherry Studio if you want the larger community (51,943 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Onyx if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.