head to head · open source

npq vs eraser

npq has 1,796 GitHub stars, 43 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. eraser has 622 stars, 74 forks, 82 open issues and last shipped yesterday. npq leads on adoption by 189% (1,796 vs 622 stars). npq is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0; eraser is written in Go under Apache-2.0. npq has attracted 2% as many forks as stars, eraser 12%. eraser was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (security-tools, vulnerabilities), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

npq ★ 1.8K eraser ★ 622 category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

npq eraser
GitHub stars ★ 1.8K ★ 622
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript Go
Last push 2026-08-25 2026-09-28
Forks ⑂ 43 ⑂ 74
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick npq if

  • You weight community size — 1.8K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full npq profile →

pick eraser if

  • You want the eraser feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and eraser fits your workflow better

full eraser profile →

About npq

npq is a command line security tool that audits npm packages before they are installed, aimed at Node.js developers and supply chain security teams who want a pre install checkpoint rather than discovering a malicious or vulnerable dependency after its install scripts have already run.

read the full npq overview →

About eraser

Eraser is an Apache 2.0 licensed Kubernetes operator, written in Go, that helps Kubernetes administrators remove a list of non running container images from all nodes in a cluster.

read the full eraser overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

payloadsallthethings vs anthropic-cybersecurity-skills payloadsallthethings vs projectdiscovery payloadsallthethings vs pentagi payloadsallthethings vs pentestgpt payloadsallthethings vs osintgram payloadsallthethings vs vuls payloadsallthethings vs osv-scanner payloadsallthethings vs nettacker supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault

More Threat Detection & Response projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.

npq vs PayloadsAllTheThings npq vs Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills npq vs ProjectDiscovery npq vs pentagi npq vs PentestGPT npq vs crowdsec npq vs Osintgram npq vs thc-hydra npq vs vuls npq vs osv-scanner npq vs rengine npq vs reconftw

Frequently asked questions

Is npq or eraser more popular?

npq has 1,796 GitHub stars and eraser has 622. npq has the larger community by that measure.

Are npq and eraser free?

Both are open source. npq is licensed under Apache-2.0 and eraser under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between npq and eraser?

npq is written in JavaScript and eraser in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, npq or eraser?

Choose npq if you want the larger community (1,796 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose eraser if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.