head to head · open source
nanobot vs screenpipe
nanobot has 49,766 GitHub stars, 8,713 forks, 775 open issues and last shipped yesterday. screenpipe has 22,209 stars, 2,263 forks, 36 open issues and last shipped yesterday. nanobot leads on adoption by 124% (49,766 vs 22,209 stars). nanobot is written in Python under MIT; screenpipe is written in Rust under a custom or non-standard licence. nanobot has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, screenpipe 10%. screenpipe was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| nanobot | screenpipe | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 50K | ★ 22K |
| License | MIT | Custom / other |
| Written in | Python | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 2.3K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick nanobot if
- You weight community size — 50K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick screenpipe if
- You want the screenpipe feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and screenpipe fits your workflow better
About nanobot
English 简体中文 繁體中文 Español Français Bahasa Indonesia 日本語 한국어 Русский Tiếng Việt Discord · X · WeChat / Feishu nanobot 🐈 nanobot is an ultra lightweight, open source, self hosted personal AI agent framework written in Python. It runs in a WebUI, terminal, or chat apps and combines tools, long term memory, MCP integrations, model routing, multi agent delegation, scheduled automation, and an OpenAI compatible API in a small, readable core. Start Here What can nanobot do? nanobot is a self hosted personal AI agent runtime. It can: run in a browser WebUI or terminal connect to Telegram, Discord, Slack, WeChat, Email…
read the full nanobot overview →
About screenpipe
DOWNLOAD SCREENPIPE [ screenpipe YC S26 ] Screenpipe remembers how you actually work Record your screen continuously locally and provide context to your agents (Claude, Codex, Openclaw, Hermes, Runner...) what is this? screenpipe capture all your computer work locally and power your agents remember everything never forget what you saw, heard, or did run agents that work based on what you do generate agents, skills, and automations based on what you do search with ai find anything using natural language 100% local your data lives on your machine only source available inspect, modify, audit (LICENSE.md) company…
read the full screenpipe overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is nanobot or screenpipe more popular?
nanobot has 49,766 GitHub stars and screenpipe has 22,209. nanobot has the larger community by that measure.
Are nanobot and screenpipe free?
Both are open source. nanobot is licensed under MIT, and screenpipe has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between nanobot and screenpipe ?
nanobot is written in Python and screenpipe in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, nanobot or screenpipe ?
Choose nanobot if you want the larger community (49,766 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose screenpipe if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.