head to head · open source
nanobot vs python-telegram-bot
nanobot has 49,806 GitHub stars, 8,711 forks, 775 open issues and last shipped yesterday. python-telegram-bot has 29,551 stars, 6,182 forks, 31 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. nanobot leads on adoption by 69% (49,806 vs 29,551 stars). nanobot is written in Python under MIT; python-telegram-bot is written in Python under GPL-3.0. nanobot has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, python-telegram-bot 21%. nanobot was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (chatbot), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| nanobot | python-telegram-bot | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 50K | ★ 30K |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 6.2K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick nanobot if
- You weight community size — 50K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick python-telegram-bot if
- You want the python-telegram-bot feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and python-telegram-bot fits your workflow better
About nanobot
English 简体中文 繁體中文 Español Français Bahasa Indonesia 日本語 한국어 Русский Tiếng Việt Discord · X · WeChat / Feishu nanobot 🐈 nanobot is an ultra lightweight, open source, self hosted personal AI agent framework written in Python. It runs in a WebUI, terminal, or chat apps and combines tools, long term memory, MCP integrations, model routing, multi agent delegation, scheduled automation, and an OpenAI compatible API in a small, readable core. Start Here What can nanobot do? nanobot is a self hosted personal AI agent runtime. It can: run in a browser WebUI or terminal connect to Telegram, Discord, Slack, WeChat, Email…
read the full nanobot overview →
About python-telegram-bot
.. image:: :align: center :target: :alt: python telegram bot Logo .. image:: :target: :alt: PyPi Package Version .. image:: :target: :alt: Supported Python versions .. image:: :target: :alt: Supported Bot API version .. image:: :target: :alt: PyPi Package Monthly Download .. image:: :target: :alt: Documentation Status .. image:: :target: :alt: LGPLv3 License .. image:: :target: :alt: Github Actions workflow .. image:: :target: :alt: Code coverage .. image:: :target: :alt: Median time to resolve an issue .. image:: :target: :alt: Code quality: Codacy .. image:: :target: :alt: Code Style: Black .. image:: :target…
read the full python-telegram-bot overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is nanobot or python-telegram-bot more popular?
nanobot has 49,806 GitHub stars and python-telegram-bot has 29,551. nanobot has the larger community by that measure.
Are nanobot and python-telegram-bot free?
Both are open source. nanobot is licensed under MIT and python-telegram-bot under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between nanobot and python-telegram-bot?
nanobot is written in Python and python-telegram-bot in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, nanobot or python-telegram-bot?
Choose nanobot if you want the larger community (49,806 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose python-telegram-bot if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.