head to head · open source
nanobot vs chatgpt_telegram_bot
nanobot has 49,806 GitHub stars, 8,711 forks, 775 open issues and last shipped yesterday. chatgpt_telegram_bot has 5,552 stars, 1,907 forks, 56 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. nanobot leads on adoption by 797% (49,806 vs 5,552 stars). nanobot is written in Python under MIT; chatgpt_telegram_bot is written in Python under MIT. nanobot has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, chatgpt_telegram_bot 34%. nanobot was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (chatbot), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| nanobot | chatgpt_telegram_bot | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 50K | ★ 5.6K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-06-14 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 1.9K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick nanobot if
- You weight community size — 50K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick chatgpt_telegram_bot if
- You want the chatgpt_telegram_bot feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and chatgpt_telegram_bot fits your workflow better
About nanobot
English 简体中文 繁體中文 Español Français Bahasa Indonesia 日本語 한국어 Русский Tiếng Việt Discord · X · WeChat / Feishu nanobot 🐈 nanobot is an ultra lightweight, open source, self hosted personal AI agent framework written in Python. It runs in a WebUI, terminal, or chat apps and combines tools, long term memory, MCP integrations, model routing, multi agent delegation, scheduled automation, and an OpenAI compatible API in a small, readable core. Start Here What can nanobot do? nanobot is a self hosted personal AI agent runtime. It can: run in a browser WebUI or terminal connect to Telegram, Discord, Slack, WeChat, Email…
read the full nanobot overview →
About chatgpt_telegram_bot
🤖 ChatGPT Telegram Bot ChatGPT, re created as a Telegram bot — and it works great. GPT 5.5 · Anthropic Claude (Opus / Sonnet / Haiku) · Vision · Voice · Image generation Fast replies, no daily limits, message streaming and 15 special chat modes. Web chatbots are great — but they're often laggy, rate limited, and locked behind a browser tab. This project puts the best models from OpenAI and Anthropic right inside Telegram , with your own API keys and no daily limits. 🚀 Try the live bot: @jadvebot · 🌐 Web: jadve.com — or deploy your own in two commands (Quick start ↓). ✨ Features ⚡ Low latency — replies usually…
read the full chatgpt_telegram_bot overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is nanobot or chatgpt_telegram_bot more popular?
nanobot has 49,806 GitHub stars and chatgpt_telegram_bot has 5,552. nanobot has the larger community by that measure.
Are nanobot and chatgpt_telegram_bot free?
Both are open source. nanobot is licensed under MIT and chatgpt_telegram_bot under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between nanobot and chatgpt_telegram_bot?
nanobot is written in Python and chatgpt_telegram_bot in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, nanobot or chatgpt_telegram_bot?
Choose nanobot if you want the larger community (49,806 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose chatgpt_telegram_bot if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.