head to head · open source

Mermaid vs reaviz

Mermaid has 90,299 GitHub stars, 9,266 forks, 1,781 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. reaviz has 1,250 stars, 124 forks, 32 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Mermaid leads on adoption by 7,124% (90,299 vs 1,250 stars). Mermaid is written in TypeScript under MIT; reaviz is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. Mermaid has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, reaviz 10%. Mermaid was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Mermaid ★ 90K reaviz ★ 1.3K category Data & Analytics

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

Mermaid reaviz
GitHub stars ★ 90K ★ 1.3K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-15 2026-08-10
Forks ⑂ 9.3K ⑂ 124
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Mermaid if

  • You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Mermaid profile →

pick reaviz if

  • You want the reaviz feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and reaviz fits your workflow better

full reaviz profile →

About Mermaid

Mermaid is a JavaScript based diagramming tool that renders diagrams from Markdown like text definitions. It lives in the JavaScript/TypeScript ecosystem and operates both in the browser and in Node.js environments. The project’s core purpose is to eliminate the gap between software development and documentation by letting developers write diagrams alongside code, avoiding the rot and overhead of manual diagram maintenance.

read the full Mermaid overview →

About reaviz

REAVIZ is an Apache 2.0 chart component library for React, maintained by @goodcodeus, that renders charts natively in React while using D3js under the hood for calculations — made for TypeScript developers who need customizable charts inside an existing React application.

read the full reaviz overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K ClickHouse ★ 50K

Related comparisons

mermaid vs apache-superset mermaid vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs pixijs mermaid vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot godot vs pixijs supabase vs metabase grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai crawl4ai vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapy scrapling vs scrapy crawl4ai vs easyspider scrapling vs easyspider crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot

More Business Intelligence & Reporting projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Business Intelligence & Reporting field.

Mermaid vs Apache Superset Mermaid vs echarts Mermaid vs Metabase Mermaid vs pixijs Mermaid vs diagram-design Mermaid vs Redash Mermaid vs dataease Mermaid vs dash Mermaid vs plotly.js Mermaid vs deck.gl Mermaid vs G6 Mermaid vs sigma.js

Frequently asked questions

Is Mermaid or reaviz more popular?

Mermaid has 90,299 GitHub stars and reaviz has 1,250. Mermaid has the larger community by that measure.

Are Mermaid and reaviz free?

Both are open source. Mermaid is licensed under MIT and reaviz under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Mermaid and reaviz?

Mermaid is written in TypeScript and reaviz in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Mermaid or reaviz?

Choose Mermaid if you want the larger community (90,299 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose reaviz if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.