head to head · open source

llama_index vs unbody

llama_index has 52,206 GitHub stars, 8,165 forks, 770 open issues and last shipped yesterday. unbody has 524 stars, 47 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. llama_index leads on adoption by 9,863% (52,206 vs 524 stars). llama_index is written in Python under MIT; unbody is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. llama_index has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, unbody 9%. llama_index was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (llm, rag, vector-database), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

llama_index ★ 52K unbody ★ 524 category AI & Machine Learning

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

llama_index unbody
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 524
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-04-14
Forks ⑂ 8.2K ⑂ 47
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick llama_index if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full llama_index profile →

pick unbody if

  • You want the unbody feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and unbody fits your workflow better

full unbody profile →

About llama_index

LlamaIndex is an MIT licensed, open source Python framework for building agentic applications — retrieval augmented generation systems, agents and multi agent workflows — on top of private documents and data, and it is aimed at AI engineers and teams who need to connect large language models to their own sources of context.

read the full llama_index overview →

About unbody

Unbody is an Apache 2.0, TypeScript, modular open source backend for building AI native software that is designed for knowledge rather than static data, and it is aimed at developers and teams that want to self host the ingestion, indexing and retrieval layer behind chat, search and agentic applications.

read the full unbody overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

ollama vs llama-index openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all llama-cpp vs vllm openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm hermes-agent vs opencode hermes-agent vs n8n openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail

More Machine Learning Infrastructure projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Machine Learning Infrastructure field.

llama_index vs Ollama llama_index vs llama.cpp llama_index vs vllm llama_index vs GPT4All llama_index vs LocalAI llama_index vs faiss llama_index vs PageIndex llama_index vs Langfuse llama_index vs cognee llama_index vs taipy llama_index vs dagster llama_index vs zvec

Frequently asked questions

Is llama_index or unbody more popular?

llama_index has 52,206 GitHub stars and unbody has 524. llama_index has the larger community by that measure.

Are llama_index and unbody free?

Both are open source. llama_index is licensed under MIT and unbody under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between llama_index and unbody?

llama_index is written in Python and unbody in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, llama_index or unbody?

Choose llama_index if you want the larger community (52,206 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose unbody if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.