head to head · open source
llama_index vs Latitude
llama_index has 52,779 GitHub stars, 8,500 forks, 770 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. Latitude has 4,742 stars, 408 forks, 65 open issues and last shipped yesterday. llama_index leads on adoption by 1,013% (52,779 vs 4,742 stars). llama_index is written in Python under MIT; Latitude is written in TypeScript under MIT. llama_index has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, Latitude 9%. Latitude was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| llama_index | Latitude | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 53K | ★ 4.7K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-26 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.5K | ⑂ 408 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick llama_index if
- You weight community size — 53K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Latitude if
- You want the Latitude feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Latitude fits your workflow better
About llama_index
🗂️ LlamaIndex (OSS Framework) 🦙 [!NOTE] The current focus of LlamaIndex is to build the best AI powered engine for document parsing and extraction. LlamaParse is our enterprise platform for agentic OCR, parsing, extraction, indexing and more. LiteParse represents our efforts to build the best free, fast, cheap text parser in the market. ParseBench and ExtractBench represent our commitment towards open benchmarking for parsing and extraction. The company itself has undergone an evolution since when this OSS framework first launched 3 years ago in 2023. Since the early days, the framework has consisted of a…
read the full llama_index overview →
About Latitude
Make your AI agents self healing Agents that fix themselves, at scale. Website · Docs · Changelog · Slack · X 🌈 Why Latitude? Latitude finds where your agent fails and gets it fixed. Observe : one line of telemetry captures every trace: multi turn sessions, tool calls, and full execution paths. (traces, sessions, tool call observability, OpenTelemetry ingest) Understand : failing traces are auto grouped into tracked signals with status, size, and trend, so you see what's breaking and how often. (signals, flaggers, behaviours, semantic search, annotations) Fix : Latitude dispatches your coding agents (Claude…
read the full Latitude overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More Machine Learning Infrastructure projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Machine Learning Infrastructure field.
Frequently asked questions
Is llama_index or Latitude more popular?
llama_index has 52,779 GitHub stars and Latitude has 4,742. llama_index has the larger community by that measure.
Are llama_index and Latitude free?
Both are open source. llama_index is licensed under MIT and Latitude under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between llama_index and Latitude?
llama_index is written in Python and Latitude in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, llama_index or Latitude?
Choose llama_index if you want the larger community (52,779 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Latitude if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.