head to head · open source

llama.cpp vs unbody

llama.cpp has 128,619 GitHub stars, 23,351 forks, 2,464 open issues and last shipped yesterday. unbody has 524 stars, 47 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. llama.cpp leads on adoption by 24,446% (128,619 vs 524 stars). llama.cpp is written in C++ under MIT; unbody is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. llama.cpp has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, unbody 9%. llama.cpp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

llama.cpp ★ 129K unbody ★ 524 category AI & Machine Learning

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

llama.cpp unbody
GitHub stars ★ 129K ★ 524
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in C++ TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-04-14
Forks ⑂ 23K ⑂ 47
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick llama.cpp if

  • You weight community size — 129K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full llama.cpp profile →

pick unbody if

  • You want the unbody feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and unbody fits your workflow better

full unbody profile →

About llama.cpp

llama.cpp is a C/C++ library and set of command line tools for running large language models (LLMs) and vision language models (VLMs) locally. It enables inference without external dependencies, targeting diverse hardware including Apple Silicon, x86 CPUs, NVIDIA GPUs (via CUDA), AMD GPUs (via HIP), and other accelerators. The project lives in the ggml ecosystem, leveraging the ggml tensor computation library for low level operations and quantized model execution.

read the full llama.cpp overview →

About unbody

Unbody is an Apache 2.0, TypeScript, modular open source backend for building AI native software that is designed for knowledge rather than static data, and it is aimed at developers and teams that want to self host the ingestion, indexing and retrieval layer behind chat, search and agentic applications.

read the full unbody overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

ollama vs llama-cpp llama-cpp vs vllm openclaw vs ollama ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm hermes-agent vs opencode hermes-agent vs n8n openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail

More Machine Learning Infrastructure projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Machine Learning Infrastructure field.

llama.cpp vs Ollama llama.cpp vs vllm llama.cpp vs GPT4All llama.cpp vs llama_index llama.cpp vs LocalAI llama.cpp vs faiss llama.cpp vs PageIndex llama.cpp vs Langfuse llama.cpp vs cognee llama.cpp vs taipy llama.cpp vs dagster llama.cpp vs zvec

Frequently asked questions

Is llama.cpp or unbody more popular?

llama.cpp has 128,619 GitHub stars and unbody has 524. llama.cpp has the larger community by that measure.

Are llama.cpp and unbody free?

Both are open source. llama.cpp is licensed under MIT and unbody under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between llama.cpp and unbody?

llama.cpp is written in C++ and unbody in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, llama.cpp or unbody?

Choose llama.cpp if you want the larger community (128,619 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose unbody if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.