head to head · open source

llama.cpp vs dingo

llama.cpp has 128,619 GitHub stars, 23,351 forks, 2,464 open issues and last shipped today. dingo has 1,704 stars, 265 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. llama.cpp leads on adoption by 7,448% (128,619 vs 1,704 stars). llama.cpp is written in C++ under MIT; dingo is written in Java under Apache-2.0. llama.cpp has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, dingo 16%. llama.cpp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

llama.cpp ★ 129K dingo ★ 1.7K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

	llama.cpp	dingo
GitHub stars	★ 129K	★ 1.7K
License	MIT	Apache-2.0
Written in	C++	Java
Last push	2026-09-18	2026-07-10
Forks	⑂ 23K	⑂ 265
Self-hosting	Yes	Yes
Data ownership	Your server	Your server

pick llama.cpp if

You weight community size — 129K stars and counting
You want the MIT license terms
Your stack matches C++
You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full llama.cpp profile →

pick dingo if

You want the dingo feature set and don't need the biggest community
You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
Your stack matches Java
You evaluated both and dingo fits your workflow better

full dingo profile →

About llama.cpp

llama.cpp is a C/C++ library and set of command line tools for running large language models (LLMs) and vision language models (VLMs) locally. It enables inference without external dependencies, targeting diverse hardware including Apple Silicon, x86 CPUs, NVIDIA GPUs (via CUDA), AMD GPUs (via HIP), and other accelerators. The project lives in the ggml ecosystem, leveraging the ggml tensor computation library for low level operations and quantized model execution.

read the full llama.cpp overview →

About dingo

DingoDB DingoDB is an open source distributed multi modal vector database independently designed and developed by DataCanvas, which integrates real time strong consistency, relational semantics, and vector semantics into a unified platform, DingoDB positioning itself as a distinctive multi modal database solution. With exceptional horizontal scalability and elastic scaling capabilities, it effortlessly meets enterprise grade high availability requirements. Furthermore, DingoDB offers extensive multi language interfaces and seamless compatibility with the MySQL protocol, delivering unparalleled flexibility and con…

read the full dingo overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Related comparisons

More Machine Learning Infrastructure projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Machine Learning Infrastructure field.

llama.cpp vs Ollama llama.cpp vs vllm llama.cpp vs GPT4All llama.cpp vs llama_index llama.cpp vs LocalAI llama.cpp vs PageIndex llama.cpp vs Langfuse llama.cpp vs cognee llama.cpp vs taipy llama.cpp vs dagster llama.cpp vs zvec llama.cpp vs langchain4j

Frequently asked questions

Is llama.cpp or dingo more popular?

llama.cpp has 128,619 GitHub stars and dingo has 1,704. llama.cpp has the larger community by that measure.

Are llama.cpp and dingo free?

Both are open source. llama.cpp is licensed under MIT and dingo under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between llama.cpp and dingo?

llama.cpp is written in C++ and dingo in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, llama.cpp or dingo?

Choose llama.cpp if you want the larger community (128,619 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose dingo if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.