head to head · open source

langgraph vs Temporal

langgraph has 41,863 GitHub stars, 7,069 forks, 786 open issues and last shipped today. Temporal has 23,144 stars, 1,909 forks, 956 open issues and last shipped today. langgraph leads on adoption by 81% (41,863 vs 23,144 stars). langgraph is written in Python under MIT; Temporal is written in Go under MIT. langgraph has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, Temporal 8%. langgraph was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

langgraph ★ 42K Temporal ★ 23K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

langgraph Temporal
GitHub stars ★ 42K ★ 23K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 7.1K ⑂ 1.9K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick langgraph if

  • You weight community size — 42K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full langgraph profile →

pick Temporal if

  • You want the Temporal feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Temporal fits your workflow better

full Temporal profile →

About langgraph

LangGraph is a low level Python orchestration framework for building stateful, long running agents, aimed at developers and platform teams who need durable execution, human in the loop control, and persistent memory instead of a turnkey agent application.

read the full langgraph overview →

About Temporal

Temporal is a durable execution platform for building resilient applications with workflows. It lives in the infrastructure and operations ecosystem, specifically within orchestration and scheduling. The server executes units of application logic called Workflows and automatically handles intermittent failures by retrying failed operations. Temporal originated as a fork of Uber's Cadence and is developed by Temporal Technologies, a startup formed by the creators of Cadence.

read the full Temporal overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langgraph openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm hermes-agent vs opencode hermes-agent vs n8n openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all llama-cpp vs vllm

More AI Development Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Development Platforms field.

langgraph vs Dify langgraph vs langchain langgraph vs ponytail langgraph vs generative-ai-for-beginners langgraph vs graphify langgraph vs claude-mem langgraph vs ragflow langgraph vs PaddleOCR langgraph vs Agent-Reach langgraph vs headroom langgraph vs Mem0 langgraph vs daily_stock_analysis

Frequently asked questions

Is langgraph or Temporal more popular?

langgraph has 41,863 GitHub stars and Temporal has 23,144. langgraph has the larger community by that measure.

Are langgraph and Temporal free?

Both are open source. langgraph is licensed under MIT and Temporal under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between langgraph and Temporal?

langgraph is written in Python and Temporal in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, langgraph or Temporal?

Choose langgraph if you want the larger community (41,863 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Temporal if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.