head to head · open source
langchain vs OpenBiliClaw
langchain has 148,892 GitHub stars, 25,031 forks, 492 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OpenBiliClaw has 3,661 stars, 199 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. langchain leads on adoption by 3,967% (148,892 vs 3,661 stars). langchain is written in Python under MIT; OpenBiliClaw is written in Python under MIT. langchain has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, OpenBiliClaw 5%. langchain was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| langchain | OpenBiliClaw | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 149K | ★ 3.7K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 25K | ⑂ 199 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick langchain if
- You weight community size — 149K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick OpenBiliClaw if
- You want the OpenBiliClaw feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and OpenBiliClaw fits your workflow better
About langchain
The agent engineering platform. LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM powered applications. It helps you chain together interoperable components and third party integrations to simplify AI application development — all while future proofing decisions as the underlying technology evolves. [!TIP] Just getting started? Check out Deep Agents — a higher level package built on LangChain for agents that have built in capabilities for common usage patterns such as planning, subagents, file system usage, and more. Quickstart If you're looking for more advanced customization or agent orchestration, check…
read the full langchain overview →
About OpenBiliClaw
🦀 OpenBiliClaw 通用个性化内容推荐 Agent——本地运行、跨平台理解你、只为你一个人构建 A general purpose personalized content discovery Agent — runs on your machine, understands only you 项目主页 English 中文 国内 AtomGit 托管：OpenBiliClaw（从 GitHub 自动同步源码） 🆕 重要更新：OpenBiliClaw 现在可以装进 DeepSeek Harness 新增 DSH 客户端插件 —— 把 OpenBiliClaw 装进 DeepSeek Harness：DSH 界面常驻第四栏（推荐 / 内容库 / 对话 / 画像 / 设置），并注册 22 个 Agent Bridge 工具，让 DSH 里的 Agent 也能读推荐、答探测、闭环学习——边用 DSH 干活，边刷跨平台个性化内容。→ github.com/whiteguo233/dsh openbiliclaw 📱 想要原生 App？Flutter 移动端客户端（Android / iOS / Web / 桌面）在独立仓库 OpenBiliClaw mobile ：推荐、对话、画像、收藏 / 稍后再看 / 30 天历史一应俱全，连接同一本地后端。 🇨🇳 国内下载（当前 v0.3.221） ：7…
read the full OpenBiliClaw overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Development Platforms projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Development Platforms field.
Frequently asked questions
Is langchain or OpenBiliClaw more popular?
langchain has 148,892 GitHub stars and OpenBiliClaw has 3,661. langchain has the larger community by that measure.
Are langchain and OpenBiliClaw free?
Both are open source. langchain is licensed under MIT and OpenBiliClaw under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between langchain and OpenBiliClaw?
langchain is written in Python and OpenBiliClaw in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, langchain or OpenBiliClaw?
Choose langchain if you want the larger community (148,892 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose OpenBiliClaw if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.