head to head · open source

faiss vs lancedb

faiss has 40,939 GitHub stars, 4,527 forks, 327 open issues and last shipped yesterday. lancedb has 11,473 stars, 1,060 forks, 627 open issues and last shipped yesterday. faiss leads on adoption by 257% (40,939 vs 11,473 stars). faiss is written in C++ under MIT; lancedb is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. faiss has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, lancedb 9%. lancedb was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

faiss ★ 41K lancedb ★ 11K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

faiss lancedb
GitHub stars ★ 41K ★ 11K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in C++ Rust
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 4.5K ⑂ 1.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick faiss if

  • You weight community size — 41K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full faiss profile →

pick lancedb if

  • You want the lancedb feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and lancedb fits your workflow better

full lancedb profile →

About faiss

Faiss is an MIT licensed C++ library for efficient similarity search and clustering of dense vectors, with complete Python and NumPy wrappers, developed primarily at Meta's Fundamental AI Research group, and it is intended for engineers and researchers who need nearest neighbour search over vector sets that range from small collections to sets that possibly do not fit in RAM.

read the full faiss overview →

About lancedb

LanceDB is an open source, developer friendly embedded retrieval library for multimodal AI, maintained in Rust and released under the Apache 2.0 license. It describes itself as a multimodal AI lakehouse: a single place where developers can build, train and analyze AI workloads over vectors, metadata and multimodal data such as text, images, videos and point clouds. It is built on top of the Lance columnar format, which provides the storage layer for efficient storage and analytics.

read the full lancedb overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 157K Open WebUI ★ 153K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail

More Machine Learning Infrastructure projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Machine Learning Infrastructure field.

faiss vs Ollama faiss vs llama.cpp faiss vs vllm faiss vs GPT4All faiss vs llama_index faiss vs LocalAI faiss vs PageIndex faiss vs Langfuse faiss vs cognee faiss vs taipy faiss vs dagster faiss vs zvec

Frequently asked questions

Is faiss or lancedb more popular?

faiss has 40,939 GitHub stars and lancedb has 11,473. faiss has the larger community by that measure.

Are faiss and lancedb free?

Both are open source. faiss is licensed under MIT and lancedb under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between faiss and lancedb?

faiss is written in C++ and lancedb in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, faiss or lancedb?

Choose faiss if you want the larger community (40,939 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose lancedb if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.