head to head · open source

lancedb vs endee

lancedb has 11,473 GitHub stars, 1,060 forks, 627 open issues and last shipped yesterday. endee has 1,295 stars, 1,650 forks, 31 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. lancedb leads on adoption by 786% (11,473 vs 1,295 stars). lancedb is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; endee is written in C++ under AGPL-3.0. lancedb has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, endee 127%. lancedb was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (image-search, vector-database), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

lancedb ★ 11K endee ★ 1.3K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

lancedb endee
GitHub stars ★ 11K ★ 1.3K
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Rust C++
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-07-29
Forks ⑂ 1.1K ⑂ 1.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick lancedb if

  • You weight community size — 11K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full lancedb profile →

pick endee if

  • You want the endee feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and endee fits your workflow better

full endee profile →

About lancedb

LanceDB is an open source, developer friendly embedded retrieval library for multimodal AI, maintained in Rust and released under the Apache 2.0 license. It describes itself as a multimodal AI lakehouse: a single place where developers can build, train and analyze AI workloads over vectors, metadata and multimodal data such as text, images, videos and point clouds. It is built on top of the Lance columnar format, which provides the storage layer for efficient storage and analytics.

read the full lancedb overview →

About endee

Endee is a C++ vector database and AI search and intelligence platform for teams that need dense, sparse, and filtered retrieval on up to one billion vectors from a single node, available as self hosted software under AGPL 3.0 or as a hosted service.

read the full endee overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 157K Open WebUI ★ 153K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail

More Machine Learning Infrastructure projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Machine Learning Infrastructure field.

lancedb vs Ollama lancedb vs llama.cpp lancedb vs vllm lancedb vs GPT4All lancedb vs llama_index lancedb vs LocalAI lancedb vs faiss lancedb vs PageIndex lancedb vs Langfuse lancedb vs cognee lancedb vs taipy lancedb vs dagster

Frequently asked questions

Is lancedb or endee more popular?

lancedb has 11,473 GitHub stars and endee has 1,295. lancedb has the larger community by that measure.

Are lancedb and endee free?

Both are open source. lancedb is licensed under Apache-2.0 and endee under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between lancedb and endee?

lancedb is written in Rust and endee in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, lancedb or endee?

Choose lancedb if you want the larger community (11,473 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose endee if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.