head to head · open source
Hermes Agent vs ctxport
Hermes Agent has 259,804 GitHub stars, 57,202 forks, 41,784 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ctxport has 653 stars, 135 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. Hermes Agent leads on adoption by 39,686% (259,804 vs 653 stars). Hermes Agent is written in Python under MIT; ctxport is written in TypeScript under MIT. Hermes Agent has attracted 22% as many forks as stars, ctxport 21%. Hermes Agent was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (ai, chatgpt, claude), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Hermes Agent | ctxport | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 260K | ★ 653 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-03-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 57K | ⑂ 135 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Hermes Agent if
- You weight community size — 260K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ctxport if
- You want the ctxport feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and ctxport fits your workflow better
About Hermes Agent
Hermes Agent ☤ Hermes Agent Hermes Desktop The self improving AI agent built by Nous Research. It's the only agent with a built in learning loop — it creates skills from experience, improves them during use, nudges itself to persist knowledge, searches its own past conversations, and builds a deepening model of who you are across sessions. Run it on a $5 VPS, a GPU cluster, or serverless infrastructure that costs nearly nothing when idle. It's not tied to your laptop — talk to it from Telegram while it works on a cloud VM. Use any model you want — Nous Portal, OpenRouter, OpenAI, your own endpoint, and many…
read the full Hermes Agent overview →
About ctxport
CtxPort One click. Structured Markdown. Any AI conversation. Your AI conversations deserve a better clipboard. 简体中文 English Supported Platforms Get Started · Features · Documentation The Problem You just spent 45 minutes in a deep conversation with ChatGPT. You found the perfect architecture for your project. Now you need to share it with Claude for implementation. What do you do? Ctrl+A, Ctrl+C? You get a mess of HTML artifacts, broken formatting, and missing code blocks. Copy each message manually? Life is too short. Screenshot it? Text in images is where knowledge goes to die. AI conversations are the new…
read the full ctxport overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Hermes Agent or ctxport more popular?
Hermes Agent has 259,804 GitHub stars and ctxport has 653. Hermes Agent has the larger community by that measure.
Are Hermes Agent and ctxport free?
Both are open source. Hermes Agent is licensed under MIT and ctxport under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Hermes Agent and ctxport?
Hermes Agent is written in Python and ctxport in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Hermes Agent or ctxport?
Choose Hermes Agent if you want the larger community (259,804 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ctxport if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.