head to head · open source
Hermes Agent vs chatgpt_telegram_bot
Hermes Agent has 259,804 GitHub stars, 57,202 forks, 41,784 open issues and last shipped yesterday. chatgpt_telegram_bot has 5,551 stars, 1,907 forks, 56 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. Hermes Agent leads on adoption by 4,580% (259,804 vs 5,551 stars). Hermes Agent is written in Python under MIT; chatgpt_telegram_bot is written in Python under MIT. Hermes Agent has attracted 22% as many forks as stars, chatgpt_telegram_bot 34%. Hermes Agent was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Hermes Agent | chatgpt_telegram_bot | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 260K | ★ 5.6K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-06-14 |
| Forks | ⑂ 57K | ⑂ 1.9K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Hermes Agent if
- You weight community size — 260K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick chatgpt_telegram_bot if
- You want the chatgpt_telegram_bot feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and chatgpt_telegram_bot fits your workflow better
About Hermes Agent
Hermes Agent ☤ Hermes Agent Hermes Desktop The self improving AI agent built by Nous Research. It's the only agent with a built in learning loop — it creates skills from experience, improves them during use, nudges itself to persist knowledge, searches its own past conversations, and builds a deepening model of who you are across sessions. Run it on a $5 VPS, a GPU cluster, or serverless infrastructure that costs nearly nothing when idle. It's not tied to your laptop — talk to it from Telegram while it works on a cloud VM. Use any model you want — Nous Portal, OpenRouter, OpenAI, your own endpoint, and many…
read the full Hermes Agent overview →
About chatgpt_telegram_bot
🤖 ChatGPT Telegram Bot ChatGPT, re created as a Telegram bot — and it works great. GPT 5.5 · Anthropic Claude (Opus / Sonnet / Haiku) · Vision · Voice · Image generation Fast replies, no daily limits, message streaming and 15 special chat modes. Web chatbots are great — but they're often laggy, rate limited, and locked behind a browser tab. This project puts the best models from OpenAI and Anthropic right inside Telegram , with your own API keys and no daily limits. 🚀 Try the live bot: @jadvebot · 🌐 Web: jadve.com — or deploy your own in two commands (Quick start ↓). ✨ Features ⚡ Low latency — replies usually…
read the full chatgpt_telegram_bot overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Hermes Agent or chatgpt_telegram_bot more popular?
Hermes Agent has 259,804 GitHub stars and chatgpt_telegram_bot has 5,551. Hermes Agent has the larger community by that measure.
Are Hermes Agent and chatgpt_telegram_bot free?
Both are open source. Hermes Agent is licensed under MIT and chatgpt_telegram_bot under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Hermes Agent and chatgpt_telegram_bot?
Hermes Agent is written in Python and chatgpt_telegram_bot in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Hermes Agent or chatgpt_telegram_bot?
Choose Hermes Agent if you want the larger community (259,804 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose chatgpt_telegram_bot if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.