head to head · open source

graphrag vs neo4j

graphrag has 36,022 GitHub stars, 3,795 forks, 47 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. neo4j has 17,241 stars, 2,703 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. graphrag leads on adoption by 109% (36,022 vs 17,241 stars). graphrag is written in Python under MIT; neo4j is written in Java under GPL-3.0. graphrag has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, neo4j 16%. graphrag was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

graphrag ★ 36K neo4j ★ 17K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

graphrag neo4j
GitHub stars ★ 36K ★ 17K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in Python Java
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-10
Forks ⑂ 3.8K ⑂ 2.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick graphrag if

  • You weight community size — 36K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full graphrag profile →

pick neo4j if

  • You want the neo4j feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and neo4j fits your workflow better

full neo4j profile →

About graphrag

GraphRAG is a modular, Python based, MIT licensed data pipeline and transformation suite from Microsoft Research that uses large language models to extract structured data from unstructured text, then exploits the resulting knowledge graph to form targeted context for question answering over private data.

read the full graphrag overview →

About neo4j

Neo4j is a Java graph database released under GPL 3.0 that stores data as nodes and relationships and queries it with Cypher, aimed at developers, data engineers, and platform teams building connected data applications who would otherwise model those relationships as tables and joins.

read the full neo4j overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm hermes-agent vs opencode hermes-agent vs n8n openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all llama-cpp vs vllm

More AI Development Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Development Platforms field.

graphrag vs Dify graphrag vs langchain graphrag vs ponytail graphrag vs generative-ai-for-beginners graphrag vs graphify graphrag vs claude-mem graphrag vs ragflow graphrag vs PaddleOCR graphrag vs Agent-Reach graphrag vs headroom graphrag vs Mem0 graphrag vs daily_stock_analysis

Frequently asked questions

Is graphrag or neo4j more popular?

graphrag has 36,022 GitHub stars and neo4j has 17,241. graphrag has the larger community by that measure.

Are graphrag and neo4j free?

Both are open source. graphrag is licensed under MIT and neo4j under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between graphrag and neo4j?

graphrag is written in Python and neo4j in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, graphrag or neo4j?

Choose graphrag if you want the larger community (36,022 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose neo4j if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.