head to head · open source

GPT4All vs examples

GPT4All has 77,401 GitHub stars, 8,291 forks, 771 open issues and last shipped 1.3 years ago. examples has 3,043 stars, 1,073 forks, 64 open issues and last shipped 14 days ago. GPT4All leads on adoption by 2,444% (77,401 vs 3,043 stars). GPT4All is written in C++ under MIT; examples is written in Jupyter Notebook under MIT. GPT4All has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, examples 35%. examples was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

GPT4All ★ 77K examples ★ 3.0K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

GPT4All examples
GitHub stars ★ 77K ★ 3.0K
License MIT MIT
Written in C++ Jupyter Notebook
Last push 2025-05-27 2026-09-04
Forks ⑂ 8.3K ⑂ 1.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick GPT4All if

  • You weight community size — 77K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full GPT4All profile →

pick examples if

  • You want the examples feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Jupyter Notebook
  • You evaluated both and examples fits your workflow better

full examples profile →

About GPT4All

GPT4All is an MIT licensed C++ chat application and Python client from Nomic that runs large language models privately on everyday desktops and laptops, built for developers and teams who want local inference without API calls, GPUs, or sending data off device.

read the full GPT4All overview →

About examples

Pinecone Examples is an MIT licensed collection of Jupyter Notebooks and sample applications that lets developers get hands on with Pinecone vector databases and common AI patterns, tools, and algorithms.

read the full examples overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

ollama vs gpt4all open-webui vs gpt4all openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai llama-cpp vs vllm openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm hermes-agent vs opencode hermes-agent vs n8n openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail

More Machine Learning Infrastructure projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Machine Learning Infrastructure field.

GPT4All vs Ollama GPT4All vs llama.cpp GPT4All vs vllm GPT4All vs llama_index GPT4All vs LocalAI GPT4All vs faiss GPT4All vs PageIndex GPT4All vs Langfuse GPT4All vs cognee GPT4All vs taipy GPT4All vs dagster GPT4All vs zvec

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT4All or examples more popular?

GPT4All has 77,401 GitHub stars and examples has 3,043. GPT4All has the larger community by that measure.

Are GPT4All and examples free?

Both are open source. GPT4All is licensed under MIT and examples under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between GPT4All and examples?

GPT4All is written in C++ and examples in Jupyter Notebook. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, GPT4All or examples?

Choose GPT4All if you want the larger community (77,401 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose examples if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.