head to head · open source
GDA-android-reversing-Tool vs afrog
GDA-android-reversing-Tool has 4,876 GitHub stars, 574 forks, 62 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. afrog has 4,455 stars, 494 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. GDA-android-reversing-Tool leads on adoption by 9% (4,876 vs 4,455 stars). GDA-android-reversing-Tool is written in Python under Apache-2.0; afrog is written in Go under MIT. GDA-android-reversing-Tool has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, afrog 11%. afrog was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| GDA-android-reversing-Tool | afrog | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 4.9K | ★ 4.5K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Go |
| Last push | 2026-04-10 | 2026-11-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 574 | ⑂ 494 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick GDA-android-reversing-Tool if
- You weight community size — 4.9K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick afrog if
- You want the afrog feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and afrog fits your workflow better
About GDA-android-reversing-Tool
ˇ GDA(GJoy Dex Analyzer) GDA, an powerful Dalvik bytecode decompiler implemented in C++, which has the advantages of fast analysis and low memory&disk consumption and an stronger ability to decompiling the apk, dex, odex, oat, jar, class, aar files. GDA is completely native software and works without any Setup and Java VM, it works well in any new windows system and virtual machine system without additional configuration. GDA Decompiler project started in 2013 and its first version 1.0 released in 2015 at GDA website . GDA is also a powerful and fast reverse analysis platform. Which does not only supports the…
read the full GDA-android-reversing-Tool overview →
About afrog
A Security Tool for Bug Bounty, Pentest and Red Teaming English • 中文 What is afrog afrog is a high performance vulnerability scanner with support for built in and custom PoCs. It is designed for fast verification, low false positives, and practical workflows across web targets, network services, PoC authoring, and SDK based integration. Install For source builds or go install , use Go 1.27 or later. Binary release Download the latest release from: Build from source Go install Quick start Scan a single target: Scan multiple targets from a file: Run only high and critical checks: Documentation The documentation is…
read the full afrog overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is GDA-android-reversing-Tool or afrog more popular?
GDA-android-reversing-Tool has 4,876 GitHub stars and afrog has 4,455. GDA-android-reversing-Tool has the larger community by that measure.
Are GDA-android-reversing-Tool and afrog free?
Both are open source. GDA-android-reversing-Tool is licensed under Apache-2.0 and afrog under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between GDA-android-reversing-Tool and afrog?
GDA-android-reversing-Tool is written in Python and afrog in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, GDA-android-reversing-Tool or afrog?
Choose GDA-android-reversing-Tool if you want the larger community (4,876 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose afrog if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.