head to head · open source

echarts vs react-chartjs-2

echarts has 67,666 GitHub stars, 19,970 forks, 1,501 open issues and last shipped 21 days ago. react-chartjs-2 has 6,937 stars, 2,424 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. echarts leads on adoption by 875% (67,666 vs 6,937 stars). echarts is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; react-chartjs-2 is written in TypeScript under MIT. echarts has attracted 30% as many forks as stars, react-chartjs-2 35%. react-chartjs-2 was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 4 topic tags (charting-library, charts, data-visualization, visualization), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

echarts ★ 68K react-chartjs-2 ★ 6.9K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

echarts react-chartjs-2
GitHub stars ★ 68K ★ 6.9K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-10-13 2026-10-29
Forks ⑂ 20K ⑂ 2.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick echarts if

  • You weight community size — 68K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full echarts profile →

pick react-chartjs-2 if

  • You want the react-chartjs-2 feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and react-chartjs-2 fits your workflow better

full react-chartjs-2 profile →

About echarts

Apache ECharts Apache ECharts is a free, powerful charting and visualization library offering easy ways to add intuitive, interactive, and highly customizable charts to your commercial products. It is written in pure JavaScript and based on zrender , which is a whole new lightweight canvas library. 中文官网 ENGLISH HOMEPAGE Get Apache ECharts You may choose one of the following methods: + Download from the official website + npm install echarts save + CDN: jsDelivr CDN Docs + Get Started + API + Option Manual + Examples Get Help + GitHub Issues for bug report and feature requests + Email dev@echarts.apache.org for…

read the full echarts overview →

About react-chartjs-2

react chartjs 2 React components for Chart.js , the most popular charting library. Supports Chart.js v4 and v3. [![NPM version][npm]][npm url] [![Downloads][downloads]][downloads url] [![Build status][build]][build url] [![Coverage status][coverage]][coverage url] [![Bundle size][size]][size url] [npm]: [npm url]: [downloads]: [downloads url]: [build]: [build url]: [coverage]: [coverage url]: [size]: [size url]: Quickstart • Docs • Stack Overflow Quickstart Install this library with peer dependencies: We recommend using chart.js@^4.0.0 . Then, import and use individual components: Docs Migration to v4 Working…

read the full react-chartjs-2 overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Related comparisons

More Business Intelligence & Reporting projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Business Intelligence & Reporting field.

Frequently asked questions

Is echarts or react-chartjs-2 more popular?

echarts has 67,666 GitHub stars and react-chartjs-2 has 6,937. echarts has the larger community by that measure.

Are echarts and react-chartjs-2 free?

Both are open source. echarts is licensed under Apache-2.0 and react-chartjs-2 under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between echarts and react-chartjs-2?

echarts is written in TypeScript and react-chartjs-2 in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, echarts or react-chartjs-2?

Choose echarts if you want the larger community (67,666 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose react-chartjs-2 if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.