head to head · open source
echarts vs django-slick-reporting
echarts has 67,666 GitHub stars, 19,970 forks, 1,501 open issues and last shipped 21 days ago. django-slick-reporting has 604 stars, 50 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped 20 days ago. echarts leads on adoption by 11,103% (67,666 vs 604 stars). echarts is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; django-slick-reporting is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause. echarts has attracted 30% as many forks as stars, django-slick-reporting 8%. django-slick-reporting was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (charts), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| echarts | django-slick-reporting | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 68K | ★ 604 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-13 | 2026-10-14 |
| Forks | ⑂ 20K | ⑂ 50 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick echarts if
- You weight community size — 68K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick django-slick-reporting if
- You want the django-slick-reporting feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and django-slick-reporting fits your workflow better
About echarts
Apache ECharts Apache ECharts is a free, powerful charting and visualization library offering easy ways to add intuitive, interactive, and highly customizable charts to your commercial products. It is written in pure JavaScript and based on zrender , which is a whole new lightweight canvas library. 中文官网 ENGLISH HOMEPAGE Get Apache ECharts You may choose one of the following methods: + Download from the official website + npm install echarts save + CDN: jsDelivr CDN Docs + Get Started + API + Option Manual + Examples Get Help + GitHub Issues for bug report and feature requests + Email dev@echarts.apache.org for…
read the full echarts overview →
About django-slick-reporting
Django Slick Reporting The one stop reporting engine for Django — analytics, charts & dashboards in a few lines of code. Grouped totals, time series, crosstabs and pivots — each one a small Python class, each one chartable with a single line, in Highcharts, Chart.js or ApexCharts . Live Demo · Documentation · Quickstart One report class, every chart Declare the calculation once . Switch the visualization by changing a single argument — no new query, no new template. Why Django Slick Reporting? Every report shape — simple aggregates, group by, time series, crosstab/pivot, and combinations of them. Charts included…
read the full django-slick-reporting overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Business Intelligence & Reporting projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Business Intelligence & Reporting field.
Frequently asked questions
Is echarts or django-slick-reporting more popular?
echarts has 67,666 GitHub stars and django-slick-reporting has 604. echarts has the larger community by that measure.
Are echarts and django-slick-reporting free?
Both are open source. echarts is licensed under Apache-2.0 and django-slick-reporting under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between echarts and django-slick-reporting?
echarts is written in TypeScript and django-slick-reporting in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, echarts or django-slick-reporting?
Choose echarts if you want the larger community (67,666 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose django-slick-reporting if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.