head to head · open source
ecapture vs Pentest-Swarm-AI
ecapture has 15,527 GitHub stars, 1,651 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Pentest-Swarm-AI has 3,115 stars, 570 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ecapture leads on adoption by 398% (15,527 vs 3,115 stars). ecapture is written in C under Apache-2.0; Pentest-Swarm-AI is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. ecapture has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, Pentest-Swarm-AI 18%. Pentest-Swarm-AI was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| ecapture | Pentest-Swarm-AI | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 16K | ★ 3.1K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | C | Go |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.7K | ⑂ 570 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick ecapture if
- You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Pentest-Swarm-AI if
- You want the Pentest-Swarm-AI feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and Pentest-Swarm-AI fits your workflow better
About ecapture
eCapture (旁观者) Capture SSL/TLS plaintext with eBPF—no MITM proxy or custom CA installation. English · 汉字 [!IMPORTANT] Supports Linux and Android on x86 64 (kernel 4.18+) and aarch64 (kernel 5.5+ ). The kernel requirement applies per CPU architecture for both Linux and Android. Requires root privileges or specific Linux capabilities. Does not support Windows or macOS. Introduction Getting started Download ELF binary file Docker image Capture OpenSSL plaintext data Modules OpenSSL module GoTLS module Other modules Videos Star History Security & operations Contributing Compilation Introduction Captures plaintext…
read the full ecapture overview →
About Pentest-Swarm-AI
The open source XBOW alternative — an autonomous API & web app pentester. Dozens of AI agents don't just scan — they exploit . They chain attacks (BOLA/IDOR, JWT forgery, mass assignment, SSRF, injection), build and score attack paths, and prove real vulnerabilities at machine speed. Built for pentesters · bug bounty hunters · red teamers · security researchers 📖 Documentation · Quick Start · vs. XBOW · Swarm vs. Multi Agent · How It Works · Roadmap Hack at machine speed. 📖 New here? Start with the documentation — quickstart, provider setup, CLI reference, and…
read the full Pentest-Swarm-AI overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is ecapture or Pentest-Swarm-AI more popular?
ecapture has 15,527 GitHub stars and Pentest-Swarm-AI has 3,115. ecapture has the larger community by that measure.
Are ecapture and Pentest-Swarm-AI free?
Both are open source. ecapture is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Pentest-Swarm-AI under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between ecapture and Pentest-Swarm-AI?
ecapture is written in C and Pentest-Swarm-AI in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, ecapture or Pentest-Swarm-AI?
Choose ecapture if you want the larger community (15,527 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Pentest-Swarm-AI if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.