head to head · open source
EasySpider vs wreq-python
EasySpider has 44,765 GitHub stars, 5,392 forks, 271 open issues and last shipped yesterday. wreq-python has 1,505 stars, 127 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped yesterday. EasySpider leads on adoption by 2,874% (44,765 vs 1,505 stars). EasySpider is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; wreq-python is written in Python under Apache-2.0. EasySpider has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, wreq-python 8%. EasySpider was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (crawler), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| EasySpider | wreq-python | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 45K | ★ 1.5K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.4K | ⑂ 127 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick EasySpider if
- You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick wreq-python if
- You want the wreq-python feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and wreq-python fits your workflow better
About EasySpider
易采集/EasySpider: Visual Code Free Web Crawler 一个 完全免费 （ 包括商业使用和二次开发 ）的可视化浏览器自动化测试/数据采集/爬虫软件，可以使用图形化界面，无代码可视化的设计和执行任务。只需要在网页上选择自己想要操作的内容并根据提示框操作即可完成任务的设计和执行。同时软件还可以单独以命令行的方式进行执行，从而可以很方便的嵌入到其他系统中。 A completely free (including for commercial use and secondary development) visual browser automation test/data collection/crawler software, which can be used to design and execute tasks in a code free visual way. You only need to select the content you want to operate on the web page and follow the prompts to complete the design and execution of the task. At the same time, the software can also be executed separately in…
read the full EasySpider overview →
About wreq-python
wreq [![Discord chat][discord badge]][discord url] [discord badge]: [discord url]: 🚀 Help me work seamlessly with open source sharing by sponsoring me on GitHub An ergonomic and modular Python HTTP Client for high fidelity protocol matching, featuring customizable TLS, JA3/JA4, and HTTP/2 signature capabilities, powered by wreq. Features Async and Blocking Client s Plain bodies, JSON, urlencoded, multipart HTTP Trailer Cookie Store Redirect Policy Original Header Rotating Proxies Connection Pooling Streaming Transfers Zero Copy Transfers WebSocket Upgrade HTTPS via BoringSSL Free Threaded Safety Automatic…
read the full wreq-python overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is EasySpider or wreq-python more popular?
EasySpider has 44,765 GitHub stars and wreq-python has 1,505. EasySpider has the larger community by that measure.
Are EasySpider and wreq-python free?
Both are open source. EasySpider is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and wreq-python under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between EasySpider and wreq-python?
EasySpider is written in JavaScript and wreq-python in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, EasySpider or wreq-python?
Choose EasySpider if you want the larger community (44,765 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose wreq-python if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.