head to head · open source
EasySpider vs wreq
EasySpider has 44,565 GitHub stars, 5,387 forks, 271 open issues and last shipped yesterday. wreq has 1,025 stars, 124 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped yesterday. EasySpider leads on adoption by 4,248% (44,565 vs 1,025 stars). EasySpider is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; wreq is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. EasySpider has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, wreq 12%. EasySpider was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (crawler), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| EasySpider | wreq | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 45K | ★ 1.0K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.4K | ⑂ 124 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick EasySpider if
- You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick wreq if
- You want the wreq feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and wreq fits your workflow better
About EasySpider
EasySpider is a visual, code free web crawler and browser automation tool distributed on GitHub under the AGPL 3.0 license. It is written in JavaScript as a graphical application and lives in the web scraping and data extraction ecosystem, sitting alongside browser automation testing tools. It also carries the alias ServiceWrapper, described as an intelligent service encapsulation system for web applications. Development spans roughly six years, with the latest push recorded in September 2026.
read the full EasySpider overview →
About wreq
wreq [![Discord chat][discord badge]][discord url] [discord badge]: [discord url]: 🚀 Help me work seamlessly with open source sharing by sponsoring me on GitHub An ergonomic and modular Rust HTTP Client for high fidelity protocol matching, featuring customizable TLS, JA3/JA4, and HTTP/2 signature capabilities. Features Plain bodies, JSON, urlencoded, multipart HTTP Trailer Cookie Store Redirect Policy Original Header Rotating Proxies Tower Middleware WebSocket Upgrade HTTPS via BoringSSL HTTP/2 over TLS Parity Certificate Store (CAs & mTLS) Multiple Runtime (Tokio, Compio) Example The following example uses the …
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is EasySpider or wreq more popular?
EasySpider has 44,565 GitHub stars and wreq has 1,025. EasySpider has the larger community by that measure.
Are EasySpider and wreq free?
Both are open source. EasySpider is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and wreq under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between EasySpider and wreq?
EasySpider is written in JavaScript and wreq in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, EasySpider or wreq?
Choose EasySpider if you want the larger community (44,565 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose wreq if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.