head to head · open source
EasySpider vs Stealth-Requests
EasySpider has 44,765 GitHub stars, 5,392 forks, 271 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Stealth-Requests has 567 stars, 57 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. EasySpider leads on adoption by 7,795% (44,765 vs 567 stars). EasySpider is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; Stealth-Requests is written in Python under MIT. EasySpider has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, Stealth-Requests 10%. EasySpider was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| EasySpider | Stealth-Requests | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 45K | ★ 567 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-09-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.4K | ⑂ 57 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick EasySpider if
- You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Stealth-Requests if
- You want the Stealth-Requests feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and Stealth-Requests fits your workflow better
About EasySpider
易采集/EasySpider: Visual Code Free Web Crawler 一个 完全免费 （ 包括商业使用和二次开发 ）的可视化浏览器自动化测试/数据采集/爬虫软件，可以使用图形化界面，无代码可视化的设计和执行任务。只需要在网页上选择自己想要操作的内容并根据提示框操作即可完成任务的设计和执行。同时软件还可以单独以命令行的方式进行执行，从而可以很方便的嵌入到其他系统中。 A completely free (including for commercial use and secondary development) visual browser automation test/data collection/crawler software, which can be used to design and execute tasks in a code free visual way. You only need to select the content you want to operate on the web page and follow the prompts to complete the design and execution of the task. At the same time, the software can also be executed separately in…
read the full EasySpider overview →
About Stealth-Requests
The Easiest Way to Scrape the Web Features Realistic HTTP Requests: Mimics Chrome browser for undetected scraping using curl cffi Automatically rotates User Agents between requests Tracks and updates the Referer header to simulate realistic request chains Built in retry logic for failed requests (e.g. 429, 503, 522) Faster and Easier Parsing: Extract emails, phone numbers, images, and links from responses Automatically extract metadata (title, description, author, etc.) from HTML based responses Seamlessly convert responses into Lxml and BeautifulSoup objects for more parsing Easily convert full or specific…
read the full Stealth-Requests overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is EasySpider or Stealth-Requests more popular?
EasySpider has 44,765 GitHub stars and Stealth-Requests has 567. EasySpider has the larger community by that measure.
Are EasySpider and Stealth-Requests free?
Both are open source. EasySpider is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Stealth-Requests under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between EasySpider and Stealth-Requests?
EasySpider is written in JavaScript and Stealth-Requests in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, EasySpider or Stealth-Requests?
Choose EasySpider if you want the larger community (44,765 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Stealth-Requests if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.