head to head · open source

EasySpider vs single-file-cli

EasySpider has 44,765 GitHub stars, 5,392 forks, 271 open issues and last shipped yesterday. single-file-cli has 1,679 stars, 147 forks, 49 open issues and last shipped yesterday. EasySpider leads on adoption by 2,566% (44,765 vs 1,679 stars). EasySpider is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; single-file-cli is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0. EasySpider has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, single-file-cli 9%. single-file-cli was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (crawler), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

EasySpider ★ 45K single-file-cli ★ 1.7K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

EasySpider single-file-cli
GitHub stars ★ 45K ★ 1.7K
License AGPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 5.4K ⑂ 147
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick EasySpider if

  • You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full EasySpider profile →

pick single-file-cli if

  • You want the single-file-cli feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and single-file-cli fits your workflow better

full single-file-cli profile →

About EasySpider

易采集/EasySpider: Visual Code Free Web Crawler 一个 完全免费 ( 包括商业使用和二次开发 )的可视化浏览器自动化测试/数据采集/爬虫软件,可以使用图形化界面,无代码可视化的设计和执行任务。只需要在网页上选择自己想要操作的内容并根据提示框操作即可完成任务的设计和执行。同时软件还可以单独以命令行的方式进行执行,从而可以很方便的嵌入到其他系统中。 A completely free (including for commercial use and secondary development) visual browser automation test/data collection/crawler software, which can be used to design and execute tasks in a code free visual way. You only need to select the content you want to operate on the web page and follow the prompts to complete the design and execution of the task. At the same time, the software can also be executed separately in…

read the full EasySpider overview →

About single-file-cli

SingleFile CLI (Command Line Interface) Introduction SingleFile can be launched from the command line by running it into a (headless) browser. It runs through Deno as a standalone script injected into the web page via the Chrome DevTools Protocol, or via WebDriver BiDi when using Firefox, instead of being embedded into a WebExtension. Installation SingleFile can be run without installing it, just download the executable file and save it in the directory of your choice here: Make sure Chrome or a Chromium based browser is installed in the default folder. Otherwise you might need to set the browser executable path…

read the full single-file-cli overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Related comparisons

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

Frequently asked questions

Is EasySpider or single-file-cli more popular?

EasySpider has 44,765 GitHub stars and single-file-cli has 1,679. EasySpider has the larger community by that measure.

Are EasySpider and single-file-cli free?

Both are open source. EasySpider is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and single-file-cli under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between EasySpider and single-file-cli?

EasySpider is written in JavaScript and single-file-cli in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, EasySpider or single-file-cli?

Choose EasySpider if you want the larger community (44,765 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose single-file-cli if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.