head to head · open source
EasySpider vs Scweet
EasySpider has 44,765 GitHub stars, 5,392 forks, 271 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Scweet has 1,658 stars, 287 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. EasySpider leads on adoption by 2,600% (44,765 vs 1,658 stars). EasySpider is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; Scweet is written in Python under MIT. EasySpider has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, Scweet 17%. EasySpider was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (data-collection), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| EasySpider | Scweet | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 45K | ★ 1.7K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-26 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.4K | ⑂ 287 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick EasySpider if
- You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Scweet if
- You want the Scweet feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and Scweet fits your workflow better
About EasySpider
易采集/EasySpider: Visual Code Free Web Crawler 一个 完全免费 （ 包括商业使用和二次开发 ）的可视化浏览器自动化测试/数据采集/爬虫软件，可以使用图形化界面，无代码可视化的设计和执行任务。只需要在网页上选择自己想要操作的内容并根据提示框操作即可完成任务的设计和执行。同时软件还可以单独以命令行的方式进行执行，从而可以很方便的嵌入到其他系统中。 A completely free (including for commercial use and secondary development) visual browser automation test/data collection/crawler software, which can be used to design and execute tasks in a code free visual way. You only need to select the content you want to operate on the web page and follow the prompts to complete the design and execution of the task. At the same time, the software can also be executed separately in…
read the full EasySpider overview →
About Scweet
Scrape Twitter / X without the official API. Tweets, profiles, followers, trends and more. Two ways to run it 1. Hosted : nothing to manage ⭐ Runs on Apify. You do not need X accounts, cookies or proxies. Configure and run from your browser , no code needed, or drive it from code with the Python API Search tweets, profile timelines, follower / following lists Export in different formats ( JSON, CSV or XLSX ) Free tier included ; pay as you go pricing is on the Actor page 2. Self hosted : full control Bring your own X accounts and proxies. Run it from Python or the CLI, inside your own infrastructure. Both give…
read the full Scweet overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is EasySpider or Scweet more popular?
EasySpider has 44,765 GitHub stars and Scweet has 1,658. EasySpider has the larger community by that measure.
Are EasySpider and Scweet free?
Both are open source. EasySpider is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Scweet under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between EasySpider and Scweet?
EasySpider is written in JavaScript and Scweet in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, EasySpider or Scweet?
Choose EasySpider if you want the larger community (44,765 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Scweet if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.