head to head · open source

EasySpider vs pdf_oxide

EasySpider has 44,558 GitHub stars, 5,386 forks, 271 open issues and last shipped yesterday. pdf_oxide has 1,033 stars, 129 forks, 322 open issues and last shipped yesterday. EasySpider leads on adoption by 4,213% (44,558 vs 1,033 stars). EasySpider is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; pdf_oxide is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. EasySpider has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, pdf_oxide 12%. EasySpider was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

EasySpider ★ 45K pdf_oxide ★ 1.0K category Data & Analytics

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

EasySpider pdf_oxide
GitHub stars ★ 45K ★ 1.0K
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 5.4K ⑂ 129
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick EasySpider if

  • You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full EasySpider profile →

pick pdf_oxide if

  • You want the pdf_oxide feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and pdf_oxide fits your workflow better

full pdf_oxide profile →

About EasySpider

EasySpider is a visual, code free web crawler and browser automation tool distributed on GitHub under the AGPL 3.0 license. It is written in JavaScript as a graphical application and lives in the web scraping and data extraction ecosystem, sitting alongside browser automation testing tools. It also carries the alias ServiceWrapper, described as an intelligent service encapsulation system for web applications. Development spans roughly six years, with the latest push recorded in September 2026.

read the full EasySpider overview →

About pdf_oxide

PDFOxide is a Rust core PDF toolkit with bindings for nineteen additional languages, plus a command line tool and an MCP server, aimed at developers and data teams that need fast, permissively licensed text extraction, image extraction, markdown conversion, and PDF creation and editing.

read the full pdf_oxide overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K

Related comparisons

crawl4ai vs easyspider scrapling vs easyspider crawl4ai vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapy scrapling vs scrapy crawl4ai vs changedetection-io scrapling vs changedetection-io crawl4ai vs lux mermaid vs apache-superset mermaid vs echarts apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs pixijs mermaid vs diagram-design apache-superset vs metabase apache-superset vs pixijs mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot apache-superset vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

EasySpider vs Crawl4AI EasySpider vs Scrapling EasySpider vs scrapy EasySpider vs changedetection.io EasySpider vs lux EasySpider vs CloakBrowser EasySpider vs Scrapegraph-ai EasySpider vs crawlee EasySpider vs colly EasySpider vs stagehand EasySpider vs proxy_pool EasySpider vs Douyin_TikTok_Download_API

Frequently asked questions

Is EasySpider or pdf_oxide more popular?

EasySpider has 44,558 GitHub stars and pdf_oxide has 1,033. EasySpider has the larger community by that measure.

Are EasySpider and pdf_oxide free?

Both are open source. EasySpider is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and pdf_oxide under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between EasySpider and pdf_oxide?

EasySpider is written in JavaScript and pdf_oxide in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, EasySpider or pdf_oxide?

Choose EasySpider if you want the larger community (44,558 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose pdf_oxide if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.