head to head · open source

EasySpider vs NewPipeExtractor

EasySpider has 44,765 GitHub stars, 5,392 forks, 271 open issues and last shipped yesterday. NewPipeExtractor has 2,035 stars, 625 forks, 182 open issues and last shipped yesterday. EasySpider leads on adoption by 2,100% (44,765 vs 2,035 stars). EasySpider is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; NewPipeExtractor is written in Java under GPL-3.0. EasySpider has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, NewPipeExtractor 31%. EasySpider was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (crawler), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

EasySpider ★ 45K NewPipeExtractor ★ 2.0K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

EasySpider NewPipeExtractor
GitHub stars ★ 45K ★ 2.0K
License AGPL-3.0 GPL-3.0
Written in JavaScript Java
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 5.4K ⑂ 625
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick EasySpider if

  • You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full EasySpider profile →

pick NewPipeExtractor if

  • You want the NewPipeExtractor feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and NewPipeExtractor fits your workflow better

full NewPipeExtractor profile →

About EasySpider

易采集/EasySpider: Visual Code Free Web Crawler 一个 完全免费 ( 包括商业使用和二次开发 )的可视化浏览器自动化测试/数据采集/爬虫软件,可以使用图形化界面,无代码可视化的设计和执行任务。只需要在网页上选择自己想要操作的内容并根据提示框操作即可完成任务的设计和执行。同时软件还可以单独以命令行的方式进行执行,从而可以很方便的嵌入到其他系统中。 A completely free (including for commercial use and secondary development) visual browser automation test/data collection/crawler software, which can be used to design and execute tasks in a code free visual way. You only need to select the content you want to operate on the web page and follow the prompts to complete the design and execution of the task. At the same time, the software can also be executed separately in…

read the full EasySpider overview →

About NewPipeExtractor

NewPipe Extractor JDoc • Documentation NewPipe Extractor is a library for extracting things from streaming sites. It is a core component of NewPipe, but could be used independently. Usage NewPipe Extractor is available at JitPack's Maven repo. If you're using Gradle, you could add NewPipe Extractor as a dependency with the following steps: 1. Add maven { url ' } to the repositories in your build.gradle . 2. Add implementation 'com.github.teamnewpipe:NewPipeExtractor:INSERT VERSION HERE' to the dependencies in your build.gradle . Replace INSERT VERSION HERE with the latest release. 3. If you are using tools to…

read the full NewPipeExtractor overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Related comparisons

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

Frequently asked questions

Is EasySpider or NewPipeExtractor more popular?

EasySpider has 44,765 GitHub stars and NewPipeExtractor has 2,035. EasySpider has the larger community by that measure.

Are EasySpider and NewPipeExtractor free?

Both are open source. EasySpider is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and NewPipeExtractor under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between EasySpider and NewPipeExtractor?

EasySpider is written in JavaScript and NewPipeExtractor in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, EasySpider or NewPipeExtractor?

Choose EasySpider if you want the larger community (44,765 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose NewPipeExtractor if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.