head to head · open source
EasySpider vs invisible_playwright
EasySpider has 44,565 GitHub stars, 5,387 forks, 271 open issues and last shipped yesterday. invisible_playwright has 2,050 stars, 236 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped today. EasySpider leads on adoption by 2,074% (44,565 vs 2,050 stars). EasySpider is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; invisible_playwright is written in Python under MIT. EasySpider has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, invisible_playwright 12%. invisible_playwright was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| EasySpider | invisible_playwright | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 45K | ★ 2.0K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.4K | ⑂ 236 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick EasySpider if
- You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick invisible_playwright if
- You want the invisible_playwright feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and invisible_playwright fits your workflow better
About EasySpider
EasySpider is a visual, code free web crawler and browser automation tool distributed on GitHub under the AGPL 3.0 license. It is written in JavaScript as a graphical application and lives in the web scraping and data extraction ecosystem, sitting alongside browser automation testing tools. It also carries the alias ServiceWrapper, described as an intelligent service encapsulation system for web applications. Development spans roughly six years, with the latest push recorded in September 2026.
read the full EasySpider overview →
About invisible_playwright
Free antidetect browser stealth for Playwright: undetected Firefox fingerprint, headless or headed. Python web scraping and captcha bypass. Open source, and it passes every bot detection test. How it works Anti bots ask two questions, and reCAPTCHA, hCaptcha and Cloudflare Turnstile score the answers. invisible playwright answers yes to both. 1. Is this a real browser? Yes. It is Firefox, patched at the C++ source level. The browser fingerprint is set inside the engine, not injected into the page: navigator, screen, GPU/WebGL, canvas, fonts, audio, WebRTC, timezone, network. Headless or headed, the same values ei…
read the full invisible_playwright overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is EasySpider or invisible_playwright more popular?
EasySpider has 44,565 GitHub stars and invisible_playwright has 2,050. EasySpider has the larger community by that measure.
Are EasySpider and invisible_playwright free?
Both are open source. EasySpider is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and invisible_playwright under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between EasySpider and invisible_playwright?
EasySpider is written in JavaScript and invisible_playwright in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, EasySpider or invisible_playwright?
Choose EasySpider if you want the larger community (44,565 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose invisible_playwright if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.