head to head · open source
EasySpider vs httpcloak
EasySpider has 44,765 GitHub stars, 5,392 forks, 271 open issues and last shipped yesterday. httpcloak has 1,356 stars, 97 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 21 days ago. EasySpider leads on adoption by 3,201% (44,765 vs 1,356 stars). EasySpider is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; httpcloak is written in Go under MIT. EasySpider has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, httpcloak 7%. EasySpider was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| EasySpider | httpcloak | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 45K | ★ 1.4K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-13 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.4K | ⑂ 97 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick EasySpider if
- You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick httpcloak if
- You want the httpcloak feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and httpcloak fits your workflow better
About EasySpider
易采集/EasySpider: Visual Code Free Web Crawler 一个 完全免费 （ 包括商业使用和二次开发 ）的可视化浏览器自动化测试/数据采集/爬虫软件，可以使用图形化界面，无代码可视化的设计和执行任务。只需要在网页上选择自己想要操作的内容并根据提示框操作即可完成任务的设计和执行。同时软件还可以单独以命令行的方式进行执行，从而可以很方便的嵌入到其他系统中。 A completely free (including for commercial use and secondary development) visual browser automation test/data collection/crawler software, which can be used to design and execute tasks in a code free visual way. You only need to select the content you want to operate on the web page and follow the prompts to complete the design and execution of the task. At the same time, the software can also be executed separately in…
read the full EasySpider overview →
About httpcloak
Every Byte of your Request Indistinguishable from Chrome. 📖 Full documentation at httpcloak.dev The Problem Bot detection doesn't just check your User Agent anymore. It fingerprints your TLS handshake . Your HTTP/2 frames . Your QUIC parameters . The order of your headers. Whether your SNI is encrypted. One mismatch = blocked. The Solution That's it. Full browser transport layer fingerprint. What Gets Emulated 🔐 TLS Layer JA3 / JA4 fingerprints GREASE randomization Post quantum X25519MLKEM768 ECH (Encrypted Client Hello) 🚀 Transport Layer HTTP/2 SETTINGS frames WINDOW UPDATE values Stream priorities (HPACK)…
read the full httpcloak overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is EasySpider or httpcloak more popular?
EasySpider has 44,765 GitHub stars and httpcloak has 1,356. EasySpider has the larger community by that measure.
Are EasySpider and httpcloak free?
Both are open source. EasySpider is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and httpcloak under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between EasySpider and httpcloak?
EasySpider is written in JavaScript and httpcloak in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, EasySpider or httpcloak?
Choose EasySpider if you want the larger community (44,765 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose httpcloak if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.