head to head · open source

EasySpider vs faster-than-requests

EasySpider has 44,565 GitHub stars, 5,387 forks, 271 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. faster-than-requests has 1,128 stars, 89 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 12 days ago. EasySpider leads on adoption by 3,851% (44,565 vs 1,128 stars). EasySpider is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; faster-than-requests is written in Nim under MIT. EasySpider has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, faster-than-requests 8%. EasySpider was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

EasySpider ★ 45K faster-than-requests ★ 1.1K category Data & Analytics

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

EasySpider faster-than-requests
GitHub stars ★ 45K ★ 1.1K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in JavaScript Nim
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-07
Forks ⑂ 5.4K ⑂ 89
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick EasySpider if

  • You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full EasySpider profile →

pick faster-than-requests if

  • You want the faster-than-requests feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Nim
  • You evaluated both and faster-than-requests fits your workflow better

full faster-than-requests profile →

About EasySpider

EasySpider is a visual, code free web crawler and browser automation tool distributed on GitHub under the AGPL 3.0 license. It is written in JavaScript as a graphical application and lives in the web scraping and data extraction ecosystem, sitting alongside browser automation testing tools. It also carries the alias ServiceWrapper, described as an intelligent service encapsulation system for web applications. Development spans roughly six years, with the latest push recorded in September 2026.

read the full EasySpider overview →

About faster-than-requests

faster than requests is an MIT licensed Python 3 HTTP client written in Nim that keeps a requests style call surface while adding a built in multi threaded web scraper, shipping as a single file with no direct dependencies, and it is aimed at developers doing high volume scraping or downloads who find python requests, urllib3, or PyCURL too slow.

read the full faster-than-requests overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K

Related comparisons

crawl4ai vs easyspider scrapling vs easyspider firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai crawl4ai vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapy scrapling vs scrapy godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs pixijs mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

EasySpider vs Crawl4AI EasySpider vs Scrapling EasySpider vs scrapy EasySpider vs changedetection.io EasySpider vs lux EasySpider vs CloakBrowser EasySpider vs Scrapegraph-ai EasySpider vs crawlee EasySpider vs colly EasySpider vs stagehand EasySpider vs proxy_pool EasySpider vs Douyin_TikTok_Download_API

Frequently asked questions

Is EasySpider or faster-than-requests more popular?

EasySpider has 44,565 GitHub stars and faster-than-requests has 1,128. EasySpider has the larger community by that measure.

Are EasySpider and faster-than-requests free?

Both are open source. EasySpider is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and faster-than-requests under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between EasySpider and faster-than-requests?

EasySpider is written in JavaScript and faster-than-requests in Nim. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, EasySpider or faster-than-requests?

Choose EasySpider if you want the larger community (44,565 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose faster-than-requests if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.