head to head · open source
EasySpider vs faster-than-requests
EasySpider has 44,765 GitHub stars, 5,392 forks, 271 open issues and last shipped yesterday. faster-than-requests has 1,127 stars, 89 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 28 days ago. EasySpider leads on adoption by 3,872% (44,765 vs 1,127 stars). EasySpider is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; faster-than-requests is written in Nim under MIT. EasySpider has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, faster-than-requests 8%. EasySpider was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| EasySpider | faster-than-requests | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 45K | ★ 1.1K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Nim |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-06 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.4K | ⑂ 89 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick EasySpider if
- You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick faster-than-requests if
- You want the faster-than-requests feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Nim
- You evaluated both and faster-than-requests fits your workflow better
About EasySpider
易采集/EasySpider: Visual Code Free Web Crawler 一个 完全免费 （ 包括商业使用和二次开发 ）的可视化浏览器自动化测试/数据采集/爬虫软件，可以使用图形化界面，无代码可视化的设计和执行任务。只需要在网页上选择自己想要操作的内容并根据提示框操作即可完成任务的设计和执行。同时软件还可以单独以命令行的方式进行执行，从而可以很方便的嵌入到其他系统中。 A completely free (including for commercial use and secondary development) visual browser automation test/data collection/crawler software, which can be used to design and execute tasks in a code free visual way. You only need to select the content you want to operate on the web page and follow the prompts to complete the design and execution of the task. At the same time, the software can also be executed separately in…
read the full EasySpider overview →
About faster-than-requests
Faster than Requests Lines Of Code counted using CLOC. Direct dependencies of the package when ready to run. Benchmarks run on Docker from Dockerfile on this repo. Developers counted from the Contributors list of Git. Speed is IRL time to complete 10000 HTTP local requests. Stats as of year 2020. x86 64 64Bit AMD, SSD, Arch Linux. Use Table Of Contents get() Description: Takes an URL string, makes an HTTP GET and returns a dict with the response. Arguments: url the remote URL, string type, required, must not be empty string, example user agent User Agent, string type, optional, should not be empty string. max…
read the full faster-than-requests overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is EasySpider or faster-than-requests more popular?
EasySpider has 44,765 GitHub stars and faster-than-requests has 1,127. EasySpider has the larger community by that measure.
Are EasySpider and faster-than-requests free?
Both are open source. EasySpider is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and faster-than-requests under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between EasySpider and faster-than-requests?
EasySpider is written in JavaScript and faster-than-requests in Nim. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, EasySpider or faster-than-requests?
Choose EasySpider if you want the larger community (44,765 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose faster-than-requests if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.