head to head · open source
EasySpider vs design-extract
EasySpider has 44,765 GitHub stars, 5,392 forks, 271 open issues and last shipped yesterday. design-extract has 4,466 stars, 385 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped yesterday. EasySpider leads on adoption by 902% (44,765 vs 4,466 stars). EasySpider is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; design-extract is written in HTML under MIT. EasySpider has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, design-extract 9%. design-extract was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| EasySpider | design-extract | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 45K | ★ 4.5K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | HTML |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.4K | ⑂ 385 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick EasySpider if
- You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick design-extract if
- You want the design-extract feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You evaluated both and design-extract fits your workflow better
About EasySpider
易采集/EasySpider: Visual Code Free Web Crawler 一个 完全免费 （ 包括商业使用和二次开发 ）的可视化浏览器自动化测试/数据采集/爬虫软件，可以使用图形化界面，无代码可视化的设计和执行任务。只需要在网页上选择自己想要操作的内容并根据提示框操作即可完成任务的设计和执行。同时软件还可以单独以命令行的方式进行执行，从而可以很方便的嵌入到其他系统中。 A completely free (including for commercial use and secondary development) visual browser automation test/data collection/crawler software, which can be used to design and execute tasks in a code free visual way. You only need to select the content you want to operate on the web page and follow the prompts to complete the design and execution of the task. At the same time, the software can also be executed separately in…
read the full EasySpider overview →
About design-extract
Built by Manav Arya Singh ( @Manavarya09 ) Sponsors Atlas Cloud — powers OpenAI compatible smart classification. For AI coding workflows, try the Atlas Cloud coding plan . Bloome — deploys your AI clone to handle every audience conversation, running in the cloud, 24/7. Try designlang on Bloome . designlang points a headless browser at any URL and reads the design system off the live DOM. One command emits 17+ files — DTCG tokens, Tailwind config, shadcn theme, Figma variables, motion tokens, typed component anatomy, brand voice, page intent labels, and a paste ready prompt pack for v0 / Lovable / Cursor / Claude…
read the full design-extract overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is EasySpider or design-extract more popular?
EasySpider has 44,765 GitHub stars and design-extract has 4,466. EasySpider has the larger community by that measure.
Are EasySpider and design-extract free?
Both are open source. EasySpider is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and design-extract under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between EasySpider and design-extract?
EasySpider is written in JavaScript and design-extract in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, EasySpider or design-extract?
Choose EasySpider if you want the larger community (44,765 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose design-extract if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.