head to head · open source
EasySpider vs design-extract
EasySpider has 44,565 GitHub stars, 5,387 forks, 271 open issues and last shipped yesterday. design-extract has 4,117 stars, 348 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. EasySpider leads on adoption by 982% (44,565 vs 4,117 stars). EasySpider is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; design-extract is written in HTML under MIT. EasySpider has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, design-extract 8%. EasySpider was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| EasySpider | design-extract | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 45K | ★ 4.1K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | HTML |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-16 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.4K | ⑂ 348 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick EasySpider if
- You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick design-extract if
- You want the design-extract feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You evaluated both and design-extract fits your workflow better
About EasySpider
EasySpider is a visual, code free web crawler and browser automation tool distributed on GitHub under the AGPL 3.0 license. It is written in JavaScript as a graphical application and lives in the web scraping and data extraction ecosystem, sitting alongside browser automation testing tools. It also carries the alias ServiceWrapper, described as an intelligent service encapsulation system for web applications. Development spans roughly six years, with the latest push recorded in September 2026.
read the full EasySpider overview →
About design-extract
Built by Manav Arya Singh ( @Manavarya09 ) Sponsors Atlas Cloud — powers OpenAI compatible smart classification. For AI coding workflows, try the Atlas Cloud coding plan . Bloome — deploys your AI clone to handle every audience conversation, running in the cloud, 24/7. Try designlang on Bloome . designlang points a headless browser at any URL and reads the design system off the live DOM. One command emits 17+ files — DTCG tokens, Tailwind config, shadcn theme, Figma variables, motion tokens, typed component anatomy, brand voice, page intent labels, and a paste ready prompt pack for v0 / Lovable / Cursor / Claude …
read the full design-extract overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is EasySpider or design-extract more popular?
EasySpider has 44,565 GitHub stars and design-extract has 4,117. EasySpider has the larger community by that measure.
Are EasySpider and design-extract free?
Both are open source. EasySpider is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and design-extract under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between EasySpider and design-extract?
EasySpider is written in JavaScript and design-extract in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, EasySpider or design-extract?
Choose EasySpider if you want the larger community (44,565 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose design-extract if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.