head to head · open source
EasySpider vs basketball_reference_web_scraper
EasySpider has 44,765 GitHub stars, 5,392 forks, 271 open issues and last shipped yesterday. basketball_reference_web_scraper has 563 stars, 133 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped yesterday. EasySpider leads on adoption by 7,851% (44,765 vs 563 stars). EasySpider is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; basketball_reference_web_scraper is written in HTML under MIT. EasySpider has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, basketball_reference_web_scraper 24%. EasySpider was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| EasySpider | basketball_reference_web_scraper | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 45K | ★ 563 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | HTML |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.4K | ⑂ 133 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick EasySpider if
- You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick basketball_reference_web_scraper if
- You want the basketball_reference_web_scraper feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You evaluated both and basketball_reference_web_scraper fits your workflow better
About EasySpider
易采集/EasySpider: Visual Code Free Web Crawler 一个 完全免费 （ 包括商业使用和二次开发 ）的可视化浏览器自动化测试/数据采集/爬虫软件，可以使用图形化界面，无代码可视化的设计和执行任务。只需要在网页上选择自己想要操作的内容并根据提示框操作即可完成任务的设计和执行。同时软件还可以单独以命令行的方式进行执行，从而可以很方便的嵌入到其他系统中。 A completely free (including for commercial use and secondary development) visual browser automation test/data collection/crawler software, which can be used to design and execute tasks in a code free visual way. You only need to select the content you want to operate on the web page and follow the prompts to complete the design and execution of the task. At the same time, the software can also be executed separately in…
read the full EasySpider overview →
About basketball_reference_web_scraper
Basketball Reference is a great site (especially for a basketball stats nut like me), and hopefully they don't get too pissed off at me for creating this. I initially wrote this library as an exercise for creating my first PyPi package hope you find it valuable! Documentation For documentation about installing the package and API methods see the documentation page. Contributors Thanks to @DaiJunyan, @ecallahan5, @Yotamho, @ntsirakis, @allanbelliti, @krlu, @aaronbannin, @benjaminmesser, @pepeefirat, @PGats, @jakeakopp, and @DigitalCurrensy for their contributions!
read the full basketball_reference_web_scraper overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is EasySpider or basketball_reference_web_scraper more popular?
EasySpider has 44,765 GitHub stars and basketball_reference_web_scraper has 563. EasySpider has the larger community by that measure.
Are EasySpider and basketball_reference_web_scraper free?
Both are open source. EasySpider is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and basketball_reference_web_scraper under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between EasySpider and basketball_reference_web_scraper?
EasySpider is written in JavaScript and basketball_reference_web_scraper in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, EasySpider or basketball_reference_web_scraper?
Choose EasySpider if you want the larger community (44,765 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose basketball_reference_web_scraper if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.