head to head · open source

dots vs terminal

dots has 31,920 GitHub stars, 4,710 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped today. terminal has 650 stars, 40 forks, 15 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. dots leads on adoption by 4,811% (31,920 vs 650 stars). dots is written in TypeScript under MIT; terminal is written in Rust under MIT. dots has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, terminal 6%. dots was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser-automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

dots ★ 32K terminal ★ 650 category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

dots terminal
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 650
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript Rust
Last push 2026-10-10 2026-08-16
Forks ⑂ 4.7K ⑂ 40
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick dots if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full dots profile →

pick terminal if

  • You want the terminal feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and terminal fits your workflow better

full terminal profile →

About dots

dots is an open source AI web agent that ships with its own anti detect Firefox browser, aimed at developers and automation engineers who need an agent to browse, log in and click through real websites without being blocked.

read the full dots overview →

About terminal

Browser Use Terminal is a Rust terminal UI for driving and steering LLM powered browser agents in your own Chrome or a headless Chromium, aimed at developers who want to automate real web tasks from the command line.

read the full terminal overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 117K Mermaid ★ 91K Scrapling ★ 87K Crawl4AI ★ 85K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

dots vs Browser Use dots vs Scrapling dots vs Crawl4AI dots vs scrapy dots vs EasySpider dots vs Lightpanda dots vs changedetection.io dots vs CloakBrowser dots vs lux dots vs Scrapegraph-ai dots vs page-agent dots vs ArchiveBox

Frequently asked questions

Is dots or terminal more popular?

dots has 31,920 GitHub stars and terminal has 650. dots has the larger community by that measure.

Are dots and terminal free?

Both are open source. dots is licensed under MIT and terminal under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between dots and terminal?

dots is written in TypeScript and terminal in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, dots or terminal?

Choose dots if you want the larger community (31,920 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose terminal if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.