head to head · open source
dots vs puppeteer-sharp
dots has 32,383 GitHub stars, 4,739 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. puppeteer-sharp has 3,934 stars, 483 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. dots leads on adoption by 723% (32,383 vs 3,934 stars). dots is written in TypeScript under MIT; puppeteer-sharp is written in C# under MIT. dots has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, puppeteer-sharp 12%. dots was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| dots | puppeteer-sharp | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 3.9K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | C# |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-10-29 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.7K | ⑂ 483 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick dots if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick puppeteer-sharp if
- You want the puppeteer-sharp feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and puppeteer-sharp fits your workflow better
About dots
dots Every AI agent is a model and a browser. You can swap the model with one flag. The browser is what the website sees. Windows, in PowerShell: Linux: Then open The conversation on the left, the browser on the right, live. It all comes down to the browser When a web agent fails, the model is rarely why. The page never loaded, a challenge appeared, the login expired, the click did not land. All of that happens in the browser, before the model gets to think. So dots is built around one: A real Firefox engine, patched in C++. The fingerprint is decided inside the engine, not painted over with JavaScript that a…
About puppeteer-sharp
Puppeteer Sharp [ ][NugetUrl] [ ][BuildUrl] [ ][BuildDemoUrl] [ ][Backers] [NugetUrl]: [BuildUrl]: [BuildDemoUrl]: [Backers]: Puppeteer Sharp is a .NET port of the official Node.JS Puppeteer API. Recent news Test the latest Firefox versions using WebDriver BiDi! Check the PuppeteerSharp 21 release notes. PuppeteerSharp now supports AOT compilation! Check the PuppeteerSharp 19 release notes!. Useful links API Documentation Slack channel puppeteer sharp StackOverflow Issues Blog Published Packages Prerequisites Puppeteer Sharp comes in two flavors: a NetStandard 2.0 library for .NET Framework 4.6.1 and .NET Core…
read the full puppeteer-sharp overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is dots or puppeteer-sharp more popular?
dots has 32,383 GitHub stars and puppeteer-sharp has 3,934. dots has the larger community by that measure.
Are dots and puppeteer-sharp free?
Both are open source. dots is licensed under MIT and puppeteer-sharp under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between dots and puppeteer-sharp?
dots is written in TypeScript and puppeteer-sharp in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, dots or puppeteer-sharp?
Choose dots if you want the larger community (32,383 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose puppeteer-sharp if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.