head to head · open source

dots vs lcu

dots has 31,817 GitHub stars, 4,695 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped today. lcu has 735 stars, 34 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped yesterday. dots leads on adoption by 4,229% (31,817 vs 735 stars). dots is written in TypeScript under MIT; lcu is written in Python under MIT. dots has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, lcu 5%. dots was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (agent-skills, browser-automation, computer-use), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

dots ★ 32K lcu ★ 735 category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

dots lcu
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 735
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-10-08 2026-10-07
Forks ⑂ 4.7K ⑂ 34
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick dots if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full dots profile →

pick lcu if

  • You want the lcu feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and lcu fits your workflow better

full lcu profile →

About dots

dots is an open source AI web agent that ships with its own anti detect Firefox browser, aimed at developers and automation engineers who need an agent to browse, log in and click through real websites without being blocked.

read the full dots overview →

About lcu

LCU is a Python tool that exposes Codex's computer use runtime to any agent harness — Claude Code, Codex CLI, Pi, and others — for people who want desktop and browser control without running the Codex app's own agent.

read the full lcu overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 117K Mermaid ★ 91K Scrapling ★ 86K Crawl4AI ★ 85K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

dots vs Browser Use dots vs Scrapling dots vs Crawl4AI dots vs scrapy dots vs EasySpider dots vs Lightpanda dots vs changedetection.io dots vs CloakBrowser dots vs lux dots vs Scrapegraph-ai dots vs page-agent dots vs ArchiveBox

Frequently asked questions

Is dots or lcu more popular?

dots has 31,817 GitHub stars and lcu has 735. dots has the larger community by that measure.

Are dots and lcu free?

Both are open source. dots is licensed under MIT and lcu under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between dots and lcu?

dots is written in TypeScript and lcu in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, dots or lcu?

Choose dots if you want the larger community (31,817 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose lcu if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.