head to head · open source
dots vs js-reverse-mcp
dots has 32,472 GitHub stars, 4,752 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. js-reverse-mcp has 3,064 stars, 399 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. dots leads on adoption by 960% (32,472 vs 3,064 stars). dots is written in Python under MIT; js-reverse-mcp is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. dots has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, js-reverse-mcp 13%. dots was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser-automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| dots | js-reverse-mcp | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 3.1K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-11 | 2026-09-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.8K | ⑂ 399 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick dots if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick js-reverse-mcp if
- You want the js-reverse-mcp feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and js-reverse-mcp fits your workflow better
About dots
dots Every AI agent is a model and a browser. You can swap the model with one flag. The browser is what the website sees. Windows, in PowerShell: Linux: Then open The conversation on the left, the browser on the right, live. It all comes down to the browser When a web agent fails, the model is rarely why. The page never loaded, a challenge appeared, the login expired, the click did not land. All of that happens in the browser, before the model gets to think. So dots is built around one: A real Firefox engine, patched in C++. The fingerprint is decided inside the engine, not painted over with JavaScript that a…
About js-reverse-mcp
JS Reverse MCP English 中文 AI first / AI native 的 JavaScript 逆向工程 MCP Server，让你的 AI 编码助手（如 Claude、Cursor、Copilot）能够像分析师一样持续调试、定位、保存和复盘网页中的 JavaScript 行为。 它不是把 Chrome DevTools API 原样搬给模型，而是把脚本、断点、网络、WebSocket、浏览器状态和本地文件 I/O 重新组织成适合 AI Agent 连续推理和操作的工具。反检测是其中一部分能力：默认使用为本 MCP 重新编译发布、独立维护的 Patchright fork 提供协议层 stealth，对强反爬站点可选启用 CloakBrowser 源码层指纹模式。 ☁️ 赞助 · Sponsored by IPWO IPWO 住宅代理支持灵活的代理配置，开发者可以根据不同任务选择相应的网络环境，用于网页访问、请求测试、地区化内容分析及自动化工作流。 对于涉及 JS 逆向、浏览器调试和 Web 网络分析的项目，住宅代理也可以作为网络环境的一种补充选择，帮助开发者更灵活地满足不同地区的访问与测试需求。 👉 免费测试入口，9 折优惠码： 0204 ☁️ 赞助 · Sponsored by Infistar.cc 无限星河 js reverse mcp × Infistar.cc 无限星河｜全模型…
read the full js-reverse-mcp overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is dots or js-reverse-mcp more popular?
dots has 32,472 GitHub stars and js-reverse-mcp has 3,064. dots has the larger community by that measure.
Are dots and js-reverse-mcp free?
Both are open source. dots is licensed under MIT and js-reverse-mcp under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between dots and js-reverse-mcp?
dots is written in Python and js-reverse-mcp in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, dots or js-reverse-mcp?
Choose dots if you want the larger community (32,472 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose js-reverse-mcp if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.