head to head · open source

dots vs invisible_selenium

dots has 31,920 GitHub stars, 4,710 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped today. invisible_selenium has 1,965 stars, 277 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped today. dots leads on adoption by 1,524% (31,920 vs 1,965 stars). dots is written in TypeScript under MIT; invisible_selenium is written in Python under MIT. dots has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, invisible_selenium 14%. dots was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (antidetect-browser, browser-automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

dots ★ 32K invisible_selenium ★ 2.0K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

dots invisible_selenium
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 2.0K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-10-10 2026-10-10
Forks ⑂ 4.7K ⑂ 277
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick dots if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full dots profile →

pick invisible_selenium if

  • You want the invisible_selenium feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and invisible_selenium fits your workflow better

full invisible_selenium profile →

About dots

dots is an open source AI web agent that ships with its own anti detect Firefox browser, aimed at developers and automation engineers who need an agent to browse, log in and click through real websites without being blocked.

read the full dots overview →

About invisible_selenium

invisible selenium is a Python package for web scrapers and browser automation engineers who want Selenium's existing API to run on an anti detect Firefox that anti bot systems do not flag as automated.

read the full invisible_selenium overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 117K Mermaid ★ 91K Scrapling ★ 87K Crawl4AI ★ 85K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

dots vs Browser Use dots vs Scrapling dots vs Crawl4AI dots vs scrapy dots vs EasySpider dots vs Lightpanda dots vs changedetection.io dots vs CloakBrowser dots vs lux dots vs Scrapegraph-ai dots vs page-agent dots vs ArchiveBox

Frequently asked questions

Is dots or invisible_selenium more popular?

dots has 31,920 GitHub stars and invisible_selenium has 1,965. dots has the larger community by that measure.

Are dots and invisible_selenium free?

Both are open source. dots is licensed under MIT and invisible_selenium under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between dots and invisible_selenium?

dots is written in TypeScript and invisible_selenium in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, dots or invisible_selenium?

Choose dots if you want the larger community (31,920 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose invisible_selenium if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.