head to head · open source
dots vs freeproxy
dots has 32,357 GitHub stars, 4,739 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. freeproxy has 573 stars, 101 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped yesterday. dots leads on adoption by 5,547% (32,357 vs 573 stars). dots is written in TypeScript under MIT; freeproxy is written in Python under Apache-2.0. dots has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, freeproxy 18%. freeproxy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| dots | freeproxy | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 573 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.7K | ⑂ 101 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick dots if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick freeproxy if
- You want the freeproxy feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and freeproxy fits your workflow better
About dots
dots Every AI agent is a model and a browser. You can swap the model with one flag. The browser is what the website sees. Windows, in PowerShell: Linux: Then open The conversation on the left, the browser on the right, live. It all comes down to the browser When a web agent fails, the model is rarely why. The page never loaded, a challenge appeared, the login expired, the click did not land. All of that happens in the browser, before the model gets to think. So dots is built around one: A real Firefox engine, patched in C++. The fingerprint is decided inside the engine, not painted over with JavaScript that a…
About freeproxy
📚 Documentation ⚡ Live Proxies (最新免费高质量代理) 学习收获更多有趣的内容, 欢迎关注微信公众号：Charles的皮卡丘 ✨ What's New 2026 09 16: Released pyfreeproxy v0.5.2 — Perform monthly code maintenance, removed TrustyTechProxiedSession , added HProxyProxiedSession , fixed several proxy sources, and improved IDE hints. 2026 08 03: Released pyfreeproxy v0.5.1 — Perform monthly code maintenance, fix the ProxyShare and ProxyVerity proxy sources, and add ProxyLister and LitPort as new proxy sources. 2026 07 13: Released pyfreeproxy v0.5.0 — Regularly check whether all proxy sources are still functional, fix three invalid proxy sources, and add three…
read the full freeproxy overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is dots or freeproxy more popular?
dots has 32,357 GitHub stars and freeproxy has 573. dots has the larger community by that measure.
Are dots and freeproxy free?
Both are open source. dots is licensed under MIT and freeproxy under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between dots and freeproxy?
dots is written in TypeScript and freeproxy in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, dots or freeproxy?
Choose dots if you want the larger community (32,357 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose freeproxy if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.