head to head · open source

dots vs dsh-antibrow

dots has 31,817 GitHub stars, 4,695 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped today. dsh-antibrow has 698 stars, 0 forks, 132 open issues and last shipped 26 days ago. dots leads on adoption by 4,458% (31,817 vs 698 stars). dots is written in TypeScript under MIT; dsh-antibrow is written in JavaScript under MIT. dots has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, dsh-antibrow 0%. dots was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, browser-automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

dots ★ 32K dsh-antibrow ★ 698 category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

dots dsh-antibrow
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 698
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-10-08 2026-09-12
Forks ⑂ 4.7K ⑂ 0
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick dots if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full dots profile →

pick dsh-antibrow if

  • You want the dsh-antibrow feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and dsh-antibrow fits your workflow better

full dsh-antibrow profile →

About dots

dots is an open source AI web agent that ships with its own anti detect Firefox browser, aimed at developers and automation engineers who need an agent to browse, log in and click through real websites without being blocked.

read the full dots overview →

About dsh-antibrow

dsh antibrow is a DeepSeek Harness plugin that hands an AI agent a browser with a persistent, engine level spoofed identity, built for automation that has to log in and stay logged in.

read the full dsh-antibrow overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 117K Mermaid ★ 91K Scrapling ★ 86K Crawl4AI ★ 85K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

dots vs Browser Use dots vs Scrapling dots vs Crawl4AI dots vs scrapy dots vs EasySpider dots vs Lightpanda dots vs changedetection.io dots vs CloakBrowser dots vs lux dots vs Scrapegraph-ai dots vs page-agent dots vs ArchiveBox

Frequently asked questions

Is dots or dsh-antibrow more popular?

dots has 31,817 GitHub stars and dsh-antibrow has 698. dots has the larger community by that measure.

Are dots and dsh-antibrow free?

Both are open source. dots is licensed under MIT and dsh-antibrow under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between dots and dsh-antibrow?

dots is written in TypeScript and dsh-antibrow in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, dots or dsh-antibrow?

Choose dots if you want the larger community (31,817 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose dsh-antibrow if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.