head to head · open source
django-allauth vs webauthn-ruby
django-allauth has 10,383 GitHub stars, 3,107 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. webauthn-ruby has 777 stars, 70 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 14 days ago. django-allauth leads on adoption by 1,236% (10,383 vs 777 stars). django-allauth is written in Python under MIT; webauthn-ruby is written in Ruby under MIT. django-allauth has attracted 30% as many forks as stars, webauthn-ruby 9%. django-allauth was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (authentication, passkeys), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| django-allauth | webauthn-ruby | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 10K | ★ 777 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Ruby |
| Last push | 2026-10-30 | 2026-10-23 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.1K | ⑂ 70 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick django-allauth if
- You weight community size — 10K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick webauthn-ruby if
- You want the webauthn-ruby feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Ruby
- You evaluated both and webauthn-ruby fits your workflow better
About django-allauth
========================== Welcome to django allauth! ========================== .. image:: :target: :align: right :alt: django allauth logo :width: 250px .. ci image:: :target: .. pypi image:: :target: .. cov image:: :alt: Coverage Status :target: .. btc image:: :target: .. liberapay image:: :target: .. pystyle image:: :target: .. jsstyle image:: :target: .. editor image:: :target: .. i18n image:: :target: .. pypidl image:: :target: :alt: PyPI Downloads .. djangodemo image:: :target: :alt: View Django Demo .. reactdemo image:: :target: :alt: View React SPA Demo Integrated set of Django applications addressing…
read the full django-allauth overview →
About webauthn-ruby
webauthn ruby WebAuthn ruby server library Makes your Ruby/Rails web server become a functional WebAuthn Relying Party. Takes care of the server side operations needed to register or authenticate a user's public key credential (also called a "passkey"), including the necessary cryptographic checks. Table of Contents Security Background Prerequisites Install Usage API Attestation Statement Formats Testing Your Integration Contributing License Security Please report security vulnerabilities to security@cedarcode.com. More : SECURITY Background What is WebAuthn? WebAuthn (Web Authentication) is a W3C standard for…
read the full webauthn-ruby overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is django-allauth or webauthn-ruby more popular?
django-allauth has 10,383 GitHub stars and webauthn-ruby has 777. django-allauth has the larger community by that measure.
Are django-allauth and webauthn-ruby free?
Both are open source. django-allauth is licensed under MIT and webauthn-ruby under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between django-allauth and webauthn-ruby?
django-allauth is written in Python and webauthn-ruby in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, django-allauth or webauthn-ruby?
Choose django-allauth if you want the larger community (10,383 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose webauthn-ruby if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.