head to head · open source
django-allauth vs fido2-net-lib
django-allauth has 10,383 GitHub stars, 3,107 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. fido2-net-lib has 1,458 stars, 201 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. django-allauth leads on adoption by 612% (10,383 vs 1,458 stars). django-allauth is written in Python under MIT; fido2-net-lib is written in C# under MIT. django-allauth has attracted 30% as many forks as stars, fido2-net-lib 14%. fido2-net-lib was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (passkeys), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| django-allauth | fido2-net-lib | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 10K | ★ 1.5K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | C# |
| Last push | 2026-10-30 | 2026-11-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.1K | ⑂ 201 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick django-allauth if
- You weight community size — 10K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick fido2-net-lib if
- You want the fido2-net-lib feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and fido2-net-lib fits your workflow better
About django-allauth
========================== Welcome to django allauth! ========================== .. image:: :target: :align: right :alt: django allauth logo :width: 250px .. ci image:: :target: .. pypi image:: :target: .. cov image:: :alt: Coverage Status :target: .. btc image:: :target: .. liberapay image:: :target: .. pystyle image:: :target: .. jsstyle image:: :target: .. editor image:: :target: .. i18n image:: :target: .. pypidl image:: :target: :alt: PyPI Downloads .. djangodemo image:: :target: :alt: View Django Demo .. reactdemo image:: :target: :alt: View React SPA Demo Integrated set of Django applications addressing…
read the full django-allauth overview →
About fido2-net-lib
Passkeys FIDO2 .NET Library (WebAuthn) A fully working and battle tested library for passkeys (FIDO2 and WebAuthn) on .NET Releases & Change log 💡 Bitwarden Passwordless API The quickest way to get started with FIDO2 and WebAuthn is with the Bitwarden Passwordless API. It's free up to 10k users and a faster way to start using passkeys on your website or mobile app. Bitwarden Passwordless.dev supports .NET Framework as well as the latest .net 8+. Get started with passwordless.dev Purpose Our purpose is to enable passwordless sign in for all .NET apps (asp, core, native). To provide a developer friendly and well…
read the full fido2-net-lib overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is django-allauth or fido2-net-lib more popular?
django-allauth has 10,383 GitHub stars and fido2-net-lib has 1,458. django-allauth has the larger community by that measure.
Are django-allauth and fido2-net-lib free?
Both are open source. django-allauth is licensed under MIT and fido2-net-lib under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between django-allauth and fido2-net-lib?
django-allauth is written in Python and fido2-net-lib in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, django-allauth or fido2-net-lib?
Choose django-allauth if you want the larger community (10,383 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose fido2-net-lib if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.